West Bengal

Howrah

CC/217/2024

MR. APURBALAL SADHUKHAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bharti AXA Life Insurance Co. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sneha Dutta

04 Dec 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, P.O. and P.S. Howrah, Dist. Howrah-711 101.
Office (033) 2638 0892, 0512 Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/217/2024
( Date of Filing : 14 Nov 2024 )
 
1. MR. APURBALAL SADHUKHAN
S/o. Gokul CH Sadhukhan Residing at 4/1/6/1, Madhusudan Das Lane, B.Garden, P.S.-A.J.C Bose B Garden, Shibpur, Howrah-711103
2. PRATIMA SADHUKHAN
W/o. Mr. Apurbalal Sadhukhan Residing at 4/1/6/1, Madhusudan Das Lane, B.Garden, P.S.-A.J.C Bose B Garden, Shibpur, Howrah-711103
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Bharti AXA Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
Registered office at Unit 601/602, 6th floor, Raheja Titanium, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (east), Mumbai-400063
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dhiraj Kumar Dey MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Minakshi Chakraborty MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 04 Dec 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Order No:  3                                                                                        Date:04/12/2024

Today is fixed for filing show-cause by the complainants. Complainants side are found present and has filed show-cause petition. Grounds stated in the show-cause petition are found satisfactory and so it is accepted. 

The admission hearing matter is taken up for consideration. Heard ld. Advocate for the complainant side. Considered submission.

In course of hearing Ld. Advocate for the complainant side has given emphasis on the documents annexed alongwith the complaint petition.

After going through the materials of the case record it appears that complainant has submitted Income Tax Return wherefrom it appears that the complainant’s total annual income is Rs.4,68,000/-. On the background of this position, this District Commission after making scrutiny of the documents filed by the complainant side finds that the complainants has invested Rs.23,70,000/- within the same financial year in various insurance policies. But fact remains that complainant has failed to satisfy this District Commission as to how the complainants have collected the huge amount of investment.

Thus, it is crystal clear that the complainants’ case is bereft of any cogent evidence.

Under this position, this District Commission has no other alternative but to dismiss this complaint case.

Thus, this complaint case is not admitted and it is dismissed. No order is passed as to cost.

Dictated & corrected by me.

 

President

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dhiraj Kumar Dey]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Minakshi Chakraborty]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.