Haryana

Karnal

CC/673/2019

Varinder Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bharti Airtel Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Ram Lal Bilam

16 Apr 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

 

                                                                     Complaint No.673 of 2019

                                                                     Date of instt. 27.09.2019

                                                                     Date of Decision: 16.04.2021

 

Varinder Singh son of Satpal Singh, resident of H.No.129, Sector-6, Urban Estate, Karnal.

                                                                             …….Complainant

                                      Versus

 

Bharti Airtel Ltd. Situated at 135, Dyal Singh Colony, Kunjpura Road, Opposite Vishal Mega Mart, Karnal, through its Branch Manager.

                                                                             …..Opposite party.

 

Complaint under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act.

Before        Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.        

          Sh.Vineet Kaushik ………..Member

                    Dr. Rekha Chaudhary…….Member

 

Present:     Shri Ram Lal, counsel for complainant.

                   OP ex-parte.

         

          Today the case was fixed for ex-parte evidence of complainant. No evidence on behalf of complainant is present. Learned counsel for complainant sought an adjournment. A careful perusal of the file reveals that on 26.11.2019, the OP was proceeded against ex-parte and case was listed for 09.01.2020 for ex-parte evidence of complainant. Thereafter, the complainant has already availed numerous opportunities for leading his ex-parte evidence but failed to conclude the same till today. More than one year has been passed in the same proceeding. It seems that the complainant is not interested in pursuing the present complaint. Hence, this Commission has left with no option but to dismiss the present complaint.

          Thus, in view of the above, the present complaint is dismissed being want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint before the appropriate Court/Commission. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated: 16.04.2021

    President,         

District Consumer Disputes 

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)              (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)                         

     Member                             Member