Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/306/2012

Mrs. Rita Bhatnagar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bharti Airtel Limited, - Opp.Party(s)

Comp. in person

10 Jul 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 306 of 2012
1. Mrs. Rita BhatnagarW/o Sh. Sharad Kumar Bhatnagar, Asstt. Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, CBO Section, Sector 7, Chandigarh, and R/o # 176, Sector 15, Panchkula. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Bharti Airtel Limited, # 21, Rajiv Gandhi Technological Park, Chandigarh 161101, through its General Manager, Customer Care Chandigarh.2. General Manager, Customer Care, Bharti Airtel Limited, # 21, Rajiv Gandhi Technological Park, Chandigarh 161101..3. Mr. Sunil Bharti Mittal, C.M.D. Bharti Airtel Limited, # 21, Rajiv Gandhi Technological Park, Chandigarh 161101.. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Comp. in person, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 10 Jul 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

                            

Consumer Complaint No.306 of 2012

 

 

Rita Bhatnagar                Vs.              Bharti Airtel Limited & ors.

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh.Sharad Kumar Bhatnagar, Authorized Agent of Complainant.

 

Dated the 10th day of July, 2012

ORDER

            Sh.Sharad Kumar Bhatnagar-authorized agent of complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“Due to technical defect(jurisdiction), I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves her right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent authority”.

            In view of the statement made by authorized agent of complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent authority, as per law.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the complainant free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

            sd/-                                          sd/-                                          sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU))       (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)          (MADHU MUTNEJA)

            MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT                                MEMBER



MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER