Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/114/2012

KARL REDDY - Complainant(s)

Versus

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY - Opp.Party(s)

S.S. PANDIYAN

22 Nov 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/114/2012
( Date of Filing : 10 Dec 2012 )
 
1. KARL REDDY
THE FAIR HAVENS, 966A, KANDAL BRIDLE PATH, UDAGAMANDALAM-643 001
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
HARISH CHANDRA MATHUR, JANPATH, NEW DELHI-110 001
2. BSNL, THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER
TAMILNADU CIRCLE, 80, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-600 002
3. TELECOM BSNL, THE GENERAL MANAGER
NILGIRIS SSA, COONOOR-643002
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                     BEFORE   HON’BLE THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                         Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                               ::      MEMBER

 

CC. No. 114/2012

                                                   DATED THIS THE 22nd  DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

Kari Reddy,

‘The Fair Havens’ 

966A, Kandal Bridle Path,

Udagamandalam – 643 001

Nilgiris District

Tamil Nadu                                                                ..Complainant

 

                                             Vs

 

1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,

Harish Chandra Mathur Lane, Janpath,

New Delhi – 110 001  

Represented by its Authorised Signatory,

 

2. The Chief General Manager, BSNL,

Tamil Nadu Circle,

80, Anna Salai,

Chennai – 600 002   

 

3. The General Manager,

Telecom BSNL,

Nilgiris SSA,

Coonoor – 643 002                                             ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for complainant                        :  M/s S.S.Pandiyan

Counsel for opposite parties 1 to 3         :  M/s T.Ravikumar

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court                                                           

                                                                                       Docket order

 

              No representation for Complainant. Today this matter is posted for appearance of complainant  and for arguments (list). When this matter was called at 10.30 a.m, there was no representation for complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.30 noon, the complainant was again not present. Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.

 

         Sd/-                                                                                                                Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                              PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.