Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/339/2014

S. KALAIVENI - Complainant(s)

Versus

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD., MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

C.K.M. APPJI

30 Nov 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

F.A. No.339 / 2014

(Against the order in C.C. No.13/2013, dated:07.08.2014 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (North))

                         DATED THE 30^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

 

S. Kalaiveni,

W/o. Mr. S. Regu,

Ganesh Garden,

No.1/1, P.C. Hostel Road,

Chetpet,

Chennai – 600 031.                                                                                                     .. Appellant / Complainant.

-Versus-

1. M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.,

Chennai Territory,

Rep. by its Manager – Coco,

No.35, Vaidyanathan Street,

Post Box No.1152, Tondiarpet,

Chennai – 600 08.    

2. M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.,

BP Shanthi Colony,

Coco Pump, AK – 3,

4^th Avenue, Anna Nagar,

Chennai – 600 040.                                                                                          .. Respondents/ Opposite parties.

 

 Counsel for the Appellant                 : M/s. C.K.M. Appaji  

Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2  : M/s. O.S. Karthikeyan

          This appeal coming up before us on 30.11.2021 for appearance of Appellant, for reporting compliance of adjournment cost of Rs.500/- to the respondents 1 & 2 and for argument (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                                                                

Docket order

Respondents 1 & 2 present.  No representation for appellant.

Today, this matter is posted for appearance of appellant, for reporting compliance of adjournment cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five hundred only) to the Respondents 1 & 2 and for arguments in list or for dismissal.  When this matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for appellant.  Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M., the appellant was again not present, written argument also not filed.  Since, the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case, hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

               

                   Sd/-                                                                                                               Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                                 R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                                   PRESIDENT