Haryana

Karnal

CC/480/2023

Rajat - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bharat FIH Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Rohit Gupta

02 Jan 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                         Complaint No.480 of 2023

                                                          Date of instt.29.08.2023

                                                          Date of Decision:02.01.2024

 

Rajat alias Rajat Singla son of Sh. Manish, resident of House no.389, Moti Nagar, Karnal.

…….Complainant

                                        Versus

1. Bharat FIH Limited, 380 Belerica road, Sri City, Chittor District Andhra Pradesh-517646.
2. Xiaomi Technology India Pvt., Ltd., ground floor, AKR Infinity, Sy. No.113, Krishna Reddy Industrial Area, 7^th Mile Hour road, Bangalore, Karnataka-560068.
3. Wishery online Pvt., Ltd., Fume Coworking Plot No.76-D, Phase IV, Gurugram.
4. Flipkart Internet Pvt., Ltd., buildings Alyssa, begonia & Clove Embassy Tech Village outer ring road, Devarabeesanahalli village, Bengaluru, Karnataka.
5. JMD Communication authorized Xiaomi Service Centre shop no.24 & 25, 1^st floor, Mughal Canal Market, Karnal.

                                                                …..Opposite parties.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

       

Present:  Sh. Sumit Sharma, counsel for the complainant.

                   Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva, counsel for the OP-2.

                   Sh. Pawandeep Kalyana, counsel for the OP-4.

                   OPs-1,3 & 5 exparte vide order dated 09.11.2023.

                  

 

                   Today the case is fixed for compromise. Compromise effected.

                   At this stage, learned counsel for the OP-2 has suffered a separate statement that the OP-2 is ready to pay Rs.9,000/- depreciated amount of the invoice amount with 45 days from the date of receipt of the order.

                   On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant suffered his separate statement to the effect that the matter has been compromised with the OP-2. He agrees to the statement given by the counsel for the OP-2, so he does not want to pursue with the present complaint further and withdraws the same being compromised.

                 In view of the above statements, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn being compromised. Both parties will bound the statement of their respective counsels. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:02.01.2024                 

                    President, 

District Consumer Disputes                                                    

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh) 

  Member                    Member