West Bengal

Howrah

MA/14/2024

SRI DIPAN RIT - Complainant(s)

Versus

BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD - Opp.Party(s)

SRI SUBARNA BANERJEE

15 May 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, P.O. and P.S. Howrah, Dist. Howrah-711 101.
Office (033) 2638 0892, 0512 Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/14/2024
( Date of Filing : 09 Feb 2024 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/150/2023
 
1. SRI DIPAN RIT
son of Sri Sujit Kumar Rit,residing at Baidya Colony, Shyamsundar Chalk, Santoshpur, P.O. Santoshpur, P.S. Uluberia, District Howrah, Pin 711 310.
2. SMT. MADHUMITA RIT
wife of Sri Sujit Kumar Rit,residing at Baidya Colony, Shyamsundar Chalk, Santoshpur, P.O. Santoshpur, P.S. Uluberia, District Howrah, Pin. - 711 310.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD
Berger House,129, Park Street, P.S.,P.0.-Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata-700 017.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Dhiraj Kumar Dey PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Minakshi Chakraborty MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 15 May 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Order No:  2                                                                            Date:15/05/2024

Today is fixed for hearing of this M.A. case which has been filed by the applicant side for allowing the prayer of Local Inspection. O.p. is contesting this case by filing W/O.

Heard both sides. Considered submission.

Perused the Local Inspection Commission and its W/O which is filed against it.

After going through the materials of the case record it appears that the coloring of the suit property by the paint of the Barger Paint Company (O.p.) has been done in the year 2020 and the complainant has filed this complaint case on 03/07/2023. It is crystal clear that more than 3 years has already been passed after coloring of the said building. Moreso the complainant has not filed such prayer after institution of this case. Under this position, it is not possible to collect any materials by the Local Inspection Commissioner at this stage.

Moreso, in this case evidence on affidavit has already been filed by the complainant and the complainant is intending to fish out/collect evidence in support of this case. But this practice cannot be encouraged.

Considering all these aspects the prayer for Local Inspection Commission of the complainant side is rejected.

In the light of the observation, this M.A. case is disposed off on contest.

Dictated & corrected by me.

 

Member

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dhiraj Kumar Dey]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Minakshi Chakraborty]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.