Haryana

Panipat

CC/285/2023

NEHA GUPTA - Complainant(s)

Versus

BENQ INDIA PVT. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

14 Aug 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/285/2023
( Date of Filing : 11 Aug 2023 )
 
1. NEHA GUPTA
315 HOME NO, DES RAJ COLONY NEAR BARSANA KUNJ
PANIPAT
HARYANA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. BENQ INDIA PVT. LTD.
CORPORATE OFFICE ADDRESSBENQ INDIA PVT. LTD.3RD FLOOR, 9B BUILDING,DLF CYBER CITY, DLF PHASE 3,GURGAON 122002
GURUGRAM
HARYANA
2. SOLD BY APPARIO RETAIL PRIVATE LTD
STAREX SCHOOL, VILLAGE- BINOLA, NATIONAL HIGHWAY -8, TEHSIL
GURUGRAM
HARYANA
3. AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,
BRIGADE GATEWAY, 8TH FLOOR,26/1, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, MALLESWARAM,BANGALORE PIN CODE 560055
BENGALURU URBAN
KARNATAKA
4. F1 INFO SOLUTIONS & SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED.
SCO- 349 , FIRST FLOOR , MUGAL CANAL KARNAL
KARNAL
HARYANA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Dr. R. K. Dogra PRESIDENT
  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary MEMBER
  Mr. Vinit Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
None for the complainants
......for the Complainant
 
Shri Raj Kumar, Team Leader on behalf of OP No.1.
Shri Amit Kumar Soni, Advocate for respondent/opposite party No.2.
Complaint qua OPs No.3 & 4 dismissed vide order dated 04.01.2024.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 14 Aug 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                    No evidence of complainants is present. A date is requested on behalf of the complainants, which is opposed. Heard. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainants from 27.05.2024 and today is last opportunity. No effort has been made by the complainants to produce the evidence. Moreso, the complainants have already availed seven effective opportunities including last opportunity. Hence, there are no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainants. Hence, the evidence of the complainants is hereby closed by order of this Commission.

 2.               This complaint has been filed against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties. In written statement, all the allegations have been denied by the opposite parties and dismissal of the complaint was prayed for.

3.                As the complainants have come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainants to prove their case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainants have not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs.

4.                This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the record-room. 

 
 
[ Dr. R. K. Dogra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Dr. Rekha Chaudhary]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Mr. Vinit Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.