Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/82/2012

The Managing Director. M/s Samsung India Private Limited - Complainant(s)

Versus

Beethoju Satyanarayana - Opp.Party(s)

Bhaskar poluri

22 May 2013

ORDER

 
FA No: 82 Of 2012
(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/07/2011 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/68/2011 of District Krishna at Vijaywada)
 
1. The Managing Director. M/s Samsung India Private Limited
M/s.Samsung India Private Limited,7th and 8th floor,IFCI Towers,No.61,Nehru Palace,New Delhi.
New Delhi
New Delhi
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Beethoju Satyanarayana
D.no.21-10-4-1, 4th lana Sri Nagar,S.N.Puram,Vijayawada.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

A. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

FA  

 

The Managing Director,

M/s Samsung India Private Limited,

7thth

No.61,New Delhi.                                        

 And

 

1.  Beethoju

S/o lateD.No.21-1-4-1, 4thSri Nagar,Vijayawada.

 

2.  The Service Engineer,

Samsung Service Centre,

PadmavathiNearVijayawada.

 

3.  The Proprietor,

S.R.R.E City, D.No.29-13-125,

SaiVijayawada.                                                

(R2 is not a necessary party to this appeal).                                  

Counsel for the Appellant       

Counsel for the Respondents 

                                                                  

 

Coram :    

                                                         

                   

 

                            Wednesday, the Twenty Second Day of May,

Two Thousand Thirteen

 

 

Oral Order

                                                         

 

 

 

1.         

2.       The brief facts as set out in the complaint are  thth       

3.      

4.

These opposite parties have got a very scientific system wherein every complaint is logged and complaint number would be given to the complainant

 

 

for    

5.      

6.         

 

 

 

7.         

7.        

8.    

 

 

 

 

9.      st  nd

10.    st

11.     

12.        Possibility of not registering the complaint in the Service Centre in spite of the fact that the complaint lodged the complaint on toll free number cannot be over ruled. However, there is no dependable evidence of the expert from the complainant that there is manufacturing defect in the A.C. Unit.  Accordingly the point is answered. 

13.      st

 

                                                                                                                                    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.