Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/470/2023

sumesh T S - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bata India - Opp.Party(s)

08 Jul 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/470/2023
( Date of Filing : 18 Sep 2023 )
 
1. sumesh T S
valalkadavu,Tvpm
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Bata India
BATA House,gurugram,hariyana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Jul 2024
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

PRESENT

SRI. P.V.JAYARAJAN                                           :  PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                                     : MEMBER

SRI. VIJU V.R                                                          : MEMBER

C.C. No. 470/2023      (Filed on 18.09.2023)

ORDER DATED: 08.07.2024

Complainant:

Sumesh T.S., Quarter No. B2/07, AAI, Residential Quarters, Vallakkadavu P.O., Airport, Thiruvananthapuram-695 008.

(Party in person)

Opposite party:

Manager (Sales), Bata India Ltd., 418/02, Bata House, Sector 17, Opp: MDI, Guru Gram-122 001, Haryana.

(By Adv. Linu R. Babu)

ORDER

SRI. P. V. JAYARAJAN:  PRESIDENT

          This complaint is filed under Sec. 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.  After hearing the matter this Commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party.  After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite party.  The opposite party entered appearance and filed written version.  The case now stands posted to 29.08.2024 for filing proof affidavit of the complainant.  Meanwhile, the complainant filed a memo stating that he is not interested to further proceed with this complaint.  In order to consider the memo filed by the complainant, this Commission suo moto advanced the case from 29.08.2024 to this date.  The memo filed by the complainant is accepted and recorded.  In view of the memo filed by the complainant, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as not pressed. 

In the result, the complaint is dismissed as not pressed. There will be no order as to cost. 

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 08th day of July 2024.

              

              Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN                : PRESIDENT 

               Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR         : MEMBER  

             Sd/-

                                               VIJU V.R                          : MEMBER

 

jb

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.