| DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE | | AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001 |
|
| |
| Complaint Case No. CC/121/2016 | | ( Date of Filing : 17 Oct 2016 ) |
| | | | 1. Smt. Sakuntala Behera, aged 44 years | | W/o. Late Ramachandra Behera, At- Saradiha, P.O- Kusudiha, Via/P.S- Basta, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Basta Seba Samabaya Samiti, represented by Secretary, Basta Seba Samabaya Samiti | | At/P.O/P.S- Basta, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 2. Balasore-Bhadrak Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Basta Branch | | Represented by Manager, Balasore-Bhadrak Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Basta Branch, At/P.O- Basta, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 3. IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi | | IFFCO Sadan, C-1, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi-110017. Having its Corporate Office is represented through Deputy Manager, Legal, IFFCO-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., Kolkata-700017. | | West Bengal | | 4. IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. represented by Branch Manager, Balasore | | Kalidaspur, In front of Hotel Chandrabhaga, P.O- Sahadevkhunta, Dist- Balasore-756003. | | Odisha |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| |
| BEFORE: | | | | HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT | | | HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER | |
| |
| PRESENT: | | | Sri Paresh Kumar Behera & Others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0 | | | Sri Paresh Kumar Behera & Others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0 | |
| Dated : 30 May 2023 |
| Final Order / Judgement | The case record is posted today for hearing. Advocate for the OPs No.1 & 2 files hazira. Neither the Complainant nor her Advocate is present nor taken any step. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Thus, the hearing of the case could not be taken up. In the present case, OP No.1 & 2 were appeared and filed their written version. As it appears from the case record, on 29.01.2018, the complainant filed a petition to implead O.P No.3 & 4 as parties, which was allowed on 26.03.2018 and the complainant has carried out the order in the complaint petition, but not filed any consolidated amended petition. In the meantime, the complainant filed one petition for amendment of the complaint petition, which was rejected on 28.11.2022 as none moved the same. It is seen that the complainant remained absent and slept over the matter since 30.04.2019 and no step is taken nor did her advocate take any step on her behalf. From the above nature and conduct of the complainant, it is clearly made out that the complainant has no interest to proceed with the case further, for which valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed. Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed earlier against the Ops shall remain infructuous. | |
| |
| | | [HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA] | PRESIDENT
| | | | | | [HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA] | MEMBER
| | | |
