Kerala

StateCommission

A/10/329

Vijay Anand - Complainant(s)

Versus

Basheerkutty - Opp.Party(s)

K.K.Rajeev Punnapuram

09 Jul 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. A/10/329
(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/11/2009 in Case No. CC/09/148 of District Alappuzha)
1. Vijay AnandMarket Road,KayamkulamAlappuhaKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. BasheerkuttyNear Fire Station,KayamkulamAlappuzhaKerala ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

 

APPEAL No. 329/2010

 

JUDGMENT DATED: 09-07-2010

 

 

PRESENT:

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU    :   PRESIDENT

 

SHRI.S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR                   : MEMBER

 

Vijay Anand, Manager,

Professional Couriers,

Apsara jewellary Building,                                   : APPELLANT

Market Road, Kayamkulam.

 

(By Adv:Sri.N.G.Mahesh)

 

            Vs.

 

Basheerkutty,

Cheeramath House,                                              : RESPONDENT

Near Fire Station, Kayamkulam.

 

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU: PRESIDENT

 

 

Appellants are the opposite parties/couriers in CC.148/09 in the file of CDRF, Alappuzha.  The appellants are under orders to pay Rs.2450/- the value of the parcel and Rs.550/- courier charges collected and Rs.10,000/- as compensation and Rs.2000/- as cost.

2. The matter is with respect to non delivery of the parcel entrusted with the opposite party on payment of Rs.550/- towards the courier charges.  Not only the parcel was not delivered but the parcel returned was an empty one without the article entrusted.

3.  The evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of PW1, RW1, Exts.A1 to A4 and Ext.B1.  We find that the Forum has considered the evidence adduced in the matter in detail.  It is seen that the parcel had weighed 5.Kg.   It did not reach the destination but was returned after so many days.  It was found that the mobile number of the addressee was also provided.  Further no records as to the intimation given to the addressee were produced.  There is no explanation for the missing of the article involved.  We find that there is no scope for admitting the appeal.

In the circumstances the appeal is dismissed in-limine.

Office will forward copy of this order to the Forum.

 

 

JUSTICE K.R. UDAYABHANU:   PRESIDENT

 

 

S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR : MEMBER

VL.

 

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 09 July 2010

[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT