Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/09/255

Sh.Lakhvir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bansal Mobile Care - Opp.Party(s)

Sh Pritam Singh Advocate

17 Nov 2009

ORDER


District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/255

Sh.Lakhvir Singh
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Bansal Mobile Care
Adev Electronics,
Samsung India Electronics Private Limited.
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh.Rohit Jain,counsel for the opposite parties No.2&3. Stated that opposite party No.3 is ready to make the payment of Rs.4,150/- (Rupees Four Thousand One Hundred and Fifty Only) for mobile set in question which was purchased on 25.5.08 within 30 days from today against old mobile set samsung Model 610. The amount will be deposit in the shape of cheque in the Forum in the name of complainant. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 17.11.09. Statement of Sh.Pritam Singh,counsel for the complainant W.O. Stated that I accept the offer of opposite party No.3 as stated by Sh.Rohit Jain,counsel for opposite party No.3, on behalf of the complainant. In view of the statement of Sh.Rohit Jain, I may kindly be allow to withdraw the complaint. I shall handover the old mobile set to opposite party No.3 through their counsel at same time. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 17.11.09 17.11.09 Present: Sh. Pritam Singh,counsel for the complainant. Sh.Rohit Jain,counsel for opposite parties No.2&3. Opposite party No.1 already exparte. Counsel for the opposite parties No.2&3 and complainant have made the above statements, they are bound by their statements. In view of statements of the complainant and learned counsel for the opposite party No.3, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The opposite party No.3 is directed to refund the payment of Rs.4,150/- in the shape of cheque in this Forum on 16.12.09 and complainant is directed to deliver the old mobile set to opposite party No.3 at the same time. File be consigned. Member Member President, D.C.F.