Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/82/06

M/s G.Rajender Reddy and Co. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bank of Baroda - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.D.Krishnamurthy

04 Dec 2008

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/82/06
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Visakhapatnam-II)
 
1. M/s G.Rajender Reddy and Co.
Plot No.171, Rd.No.13, Near Ladies Club, Jubilee Hills, Hyd.
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 82/2006 against C.C Hyderabad

 

 

Between:

 

M/s. G. Rajender Reddy &Co.

Spl. Class Contractor

Rep. by its Managing Partner

G. Shivender Reddy

S/o. G. Ram Reddy, Age; 42 years

Plot No. 171, Road No. 13,

Near Ladies Club,

Jubilee Hills,Hyderabad.                  The Senior Manager

Bank ofBaroda

D.No. 3-4-490/B,

ReddyCollege Road

Barkatpura,Hyderabad                             

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Resps:                              

 

QUORUM:

              

&

 

                            

                            

THURSDAY, THIS THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHT

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

 

         

 

 

                  on   

contracts from APHMIDC for construction of  GovernmentHospitalKurnool.               7.11.2003        

 

                 APHMIDC, it has received a letter Dt. 19.7.1996 from the beneficiary not to pay the amount covered under the BG to the complainant         

 

 

kept quiet for a period of 8 years.  The bank has been furnishing the accounts       Civil Court 

 

           

 

                

 

               

 

 

 

 

                

Evidently the bank has paid the amount to the beneficiary on 22.10.1996.       

 

              requesting him to watch the validity of the BG   

 

 

bank to             

          Maharashtra. reported in

 

         

 

                        

 

 

           these documents to be kept it for a period of    has absolutely no basis.  

          The complainant did not file any document to show that it responded to the notice issued under Ex. B11.        

 

           

 

 

                  

                            

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.