Heard the counsel for the petitioner. The matter had in fact proceeded ex-parte as against the respondent no. 2/ opposite party no. 2 and the ex-parte hearing was concluded on 06.05.2010. However, in the meantime, the composition of the Bench had changed. The matter came up before the new Bench with the result that the matter was required to be heard afresh. On 30.06.2010 when the matter came up before the new Bench, OP no. 2 filed affidavit of evidence and questionnaire against the evidence filed by the complainant. The District Forum allowed the same subject to payment of Rs.3000/- by OP 2. As such, ex-parte order was vacated and the matter was fixed for further hearing on 26.08.2010. This order was challenged by the petitioner before the State Commission and the State Commission dismissed the revision petition. The State Commission was of the view that since the OP 2 had came forward to contest the matter, an opportunity should be given to the OP 2 in that behalf. Therefore, the revision was dismissed. This is the second revision against the order of the District Forum. We do not find any jurisdictional error, illegality or material irregularity in the orders of the fora below. The revision is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage itself with no order as to cost.