Punjab

Gurdaspur

CC/76/2021

Jatinder Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Balwinder Kumar - Opp.Party(s)

sh.Pardeep Singh Adv.

19 Mar 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GURDASPUR
DISTRICT COURTS, JAIL ROAD, GURDASPUR
PHONE NO. 01874-245345
 
Complaint Case No. CC/76/2021
( Date of Filing : 12 Mar 2021 )
 
1. Jatinder Singh
S/o sher singh r/o vill. Dhariwal Khichian Police Station Purana shalla Tehsil and Distt Gurdaspur 143530
Gurdaspur
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Balwinder Kumar
S/o amarnath R/o vill. dhariwal Khichian police station Purana Shalla Tehsil and distt Gurdaspur
Gurdaspur
Punjab
2. 2.Prince
S/o Balwinder Kumar R/o vill. Dhariwal Khichian Police Station Purana shalla Tehsil and distt Gurdaspur
Gurdaspur
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Smt.Neelam Gupta PRESIDENT
  Ms.Harvimal Dogra MEMBER
 
PRESENT:sh.Pardeep Singh Adv., Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 19 Mar 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Allegedly, the complainant being a motor mechanic had taken one shop on rent from opposite parties in the year 2014 @ Rs.500/- per month and since then is paying rent and electricity charges to opposite parties but no receipt is being issued by the opposite parties. It is further alleged that the electricity meter is in the name of Sh.Som Lal. Opposite parties are not issuing him rent receipt and are rather threatening him to eject him and demolish the shops by throwing his articles lying in the shop.

2.       The question for determination for admission of the complaint in this Commission is as to whether the complainant is a consumer of opposite parties. In order to prove this fact, the complainant has placed on the file documents, copy of jamabandi for the year 2017 of village Gazikot, Tehsil Dinanagar, District Gurdaspur and copy of bill of electricity. But both these documents do not show that the complainant is a consumer of the opposite parties. Third document placed on record by the complainant is copy of the complaint filed by him in the Court of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gurdaspur U/S 107/151 CrPC. But this document is also not relevant to prove that the complainant is a consumer of the opposite parties. Hence, from the documents placed on file, it is not established that the complainant is a consumer.

3.         In view of our aforesaid discussions, the complainant being not a consumer, this complaint is not maintainable before this Commission. As such the same is dismissed being not maintainable.

4.       Copy of the order be communicated to the parties free of charges. After compliance, file be consigned.                                                                                                                                                         

            (Neelam Gupta)

                                                                              President   

 

Announced:                                                   (Harvimal Dogra)

March 19, 2021                                                        Member

*MK*

 
 
[ Smt.Neelam Gupta]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Ms.Harvimal Dogra]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.