Haryana

Karnal

EA/46/2020

The Iffco Tokio General Insurance - Complainant(s)

Versus

Balkar Singh - Opp.Party(s)

Atul Mittal

09 Apr 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL

 

                                                                     Execution No.46 of 2020

                                                                     Date of instt. 02.07.2020

                                                                     Date of Decision: 09.04.2021

 

The Iffco Tokio General, Plot No.2B & C, 3^rd Floor, Sector-28A, Chandigarh, through its Chief Manager.

                                                                   …….DH/Complainant

                                                Versus

 

Balkar Singh son of Shri Karam Singh, resident of Village Budanpur Abad, District Karnal.

                                                                             …..JD/opposite party.

 

Application U/s 25/27of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

Before         Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.   

          Sh.Vineet Kaushik ………..Member

                    Dr. Rekha Chaudhary…….Member

 

Present:      Shri Atul Mittal, counsel for OP/JD.

                   Shri S.S.Chauhan, respondent/complainant.

                  

                    Memo of appearance on behalf of respondent/complainant has been filed. Learned counsel for complainant stated at bar that the complainant has filed an appeal against the order passed by this Commission, which is pending adjudication.

                   On the other hand, learned counsel for OP/JD suffered her separate statement to the effect that the company is ready to compliance the order, passed by this Commission but complainant/DH has not transferred the registration certificate of the vehicle in question in the name of company till date. Whenever, the complainant will comply the order as per directions of this Commission, company will pay the awarded amount. However, the company will not liable to pay the interest upon the awarded amount. Therefore, he withdraws the present application U/s 25/27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

          In view of statement of learned counsel for JD/OP, the present execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated: 08.04.2021

President,    

District Consumer Disputes 

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)                (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)                            

     Member                             Member