Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/122/2014

NIVEDITA SPINING, MANAGING DIRECTOR - Complainant(s)

Versus

BALAJI ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., THE MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

S. VINOTH KUMAR

30 Jun 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.122/2014

DATED, THE 30^TH DAY OF JUNE 2022

 

M/s. Nivedita Spinning Mills,

Represented by its Managing Partner

Mr. Ramasamy,

S.F. No.208/2A, Ginning Factory Road,

Irugur Post,

Irugur,

Coimbatore – 641 103.                                                                               .. Complainant.

                                                       - Versus –

 

1. The Manager,

M/s. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited,

G.E. Plaza,

Airport Road,

Yerawada,

Pune – 411 006.     

 

2. The Manager,

M/s. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited,

No.11, 3^rd Floor, People’s Part,

Arts College Road,

Coimbatore – 18.                                                                                .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant                            : M/s. S. Vinoth Kumar

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 2            : M/s. N. Somasundaar

 

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 30.06.2022 for appearance of the complainant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                      

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for the complainant.  Opposite parties 1 & 2 present.   There was no representation for the complainant continuously for the past several hearings.

Today, this matter is posted for appearance of the complainant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.  

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M. there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 12.30 P.M. still, there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the consumer complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the consumer complaint is dismissed for default.   No cost.

 

 

               Sd/-                                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                         PRESIDENT