IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM
Dated, the 22ndday of June, 2022.
Present: Sri. Manulal V.S. President
Sri. K.M. Anto, Member
C C No52/2021 (Filed on 02-03-2022)
Petitioner : PriyaBiju,
Supriyavilasam,
Velloor P.O.
Pambady – 686501.
Vs.
Opposite parties : (1) Bajaj Fin Serve,
VaratharaPallath
Building, 1st Floor,
K.S.R.T.C. Kottayam,
Pin – 686001.
(Adv. JaisonPaliyil)
(2) State Bank of India,
70233, Manarcad,
P.B.N.I. T.C.M. Tower,
Manarcad, Kottayam -680019.
(Adv. P.G. Girija)
O R D E R
Sri. Manulal V.S. President
Complainant absent. No representation. Opposite party 1 and 2 represented. Complainant is continuously absent. In spite of receipt of notice from this Commission, complainant did not appear before the Commission and not care to file affidavit and adduce evidence in support of his case. So many adjournments were given to the complainant to adduce evidence. But he failed to adduce evidence. Thus it can be seen from the conduct of the complainant that he is not interested to proceed with the complaint. Hence complaint is dismissed for default.
Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 22ndday of June, 2022
Sri. Manulal V.S. President Sd/-
Sri. K.M. Anto, Member Sd/-
By Order
Assistant Registrar