View 313 Cases Against Bajaj Finserv
View 17540 Cases Against Bajaj
Vijayakumar M filed a consumer case on 08 Dec 2021 against Bajaj Finserv in the Thiruvananthapuram Consumer Court. The case no is CC/19/349 and the judgment uploaded on 25 Jan 2022.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PRESENT
SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
SMT.PREETHA G NAIR : MEMBER
SRI.VIJU.V.R : MEMBER
CC.NO.349/2019 (Filed on : 05.10.2019)
ORDER DATED : 08.12.2021
COMPLAINANT
Vijayakumar.M
TC.71/5214, ICC Factory Lane,
Chalai, Pin - 695036
(Party in person)
VS
OPPOSITE PARTY
The Manager,
Bajaj FinServ,
Blue Star Arcade,
TC 88/1888, Manjalikkulam Road,
Thampannor, Trivandrum,
Pin code – 695001
ORDER
SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
1. This complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.
2. The case of the complainant is that on 31.03.2019 he has purchased dress materials worth Rs.5000/- by using the Bajaj EMI Card issued by the opposite party. The loan number of said transaction is 414REMEE132928. The equal monthly instalment (EMI) fixed was Rs,1667/-. The complainant has paid three instalments on 02.05.2019, 02.06.2019 & 02.07.2019 respectively and closed the loan. The complainant’s case is that even after closing the loan account the opposite party deducted Rs.2673/- each on 02.08.2019, 04.09.2019 & 03.10.2019 respectively from the complainant’s bank account. According to the complainant the opposite party has collected excess amount of Rs.8019/- and hence there is deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party and approached this Commission for redressing his grievances.
3. After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite party and after receiving the notice from this Commission, the opposite party failed to appear before this Commission on the date fixed for the appearance of the opposite party. Hence this Commission declared the opposite party as exparte on 19.11.2019. Though the opposite party received the notice from the Commission they failed to appear before the Commission and not filed any written version regarding the complaint filed by the complainant. Hence there is no oral or documentary evidence on the part of the opposite party.
4. The evidence in this case consists of PW1, Exts.A1 to A3 on the part of the complainant. As the opposite party was declared exparte, there is no oral or documentary evidence on the part of the opposite party.
Points for consideration:-
5. Heard. Perused the records. To establish the case of the complainant the complainant himself sworn an affidavit before this Commission and Exts.A1 to A3 were produced and marked on the side of the complainant. According to the complainant an amount of Rs.8019/- was collected by the opposite party in excess and hence he has suffered mental agony and financial loss. According to the complainant all this sufferings are due to the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party and hence the opposite party is liable to compensate the complainant. By swearing an affidavit as PW1 and producing Exts. A1 to A3 documents, we find that the complainant has succeeded in establishing the case put forward by him against the opposite party, in the absence of any contra evidence on the side of the opposite party. In view of the above discussions we find that this is a fit case to be allowed in favour of the complainant.
In the result, the complaint is partly allowed. The opposite party is directed to refund Rs.8019/- to the complainant along with Rs.10,000/- as compensation and Rs.2500/- as cost of this proceedings within one month from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the amount except cost shall carry an interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of order till the date of remittance / realisation.
A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.
Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 8th day of December 2021.
Sd/-
P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
Sd/-
PREETHA G NAIR : MEMBER
Sd/-
VIJU.V.R : MEMBER
Be/
APPENDIX
CC.NO.349/2019
COMPLAINANT’S WITNESS
PWI – Vijayakumar.M
Exhibits for the Complainant
Ext.A1 series - Copy of bank statement account details
from ICICI Bank
Ext.A2 - Copy of No Dues Certificate
Ext.A3 - Copy of payment schedule from Bajaj
Finserv
OPPOSITE PARTY WITNESS - NIL
Exhibits for the opposite party - NIL
Court Exhibit - NIL
Sd/-
PRESIDENT
BEFORE THE DISTRICT
CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION
VAZHUTHACADU
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
CC.NO.349/2019
ORDER DATED : 08.12.2021
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.