Haryana

Panchkula

CC/146/2019

RANBIR KUMAR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

BAJAJ FINSERV LTD & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

SHAMMI SAROHA & RAVINDER KUMAR

29 Sep 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.  

                            

Consumer Complaint No.	:	146 of 2019
Date of Institution	:	05.03.2019
Date of Decision	:	29.09.2022

 

Ranbir Kumar, Aged 62 years Son of Shri Ram Nath, resident of House No. 692, Sector-4, Panchkula, Haryana.

                                                                                             ……Complainant.                                                                                                                                                             ….                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ……...Complainants

          Versus

1.       Bajaj Finserv Limited, Near, 1^st and 2^nd Floor, Plot No SCO – 26, Sector-26, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh, 160002, Through its Branch Manager.

2.       Bajaj Finserv Limited, Regd. Office: Mumbai- Pune Road, Akurdi-411035, Maharashtra, India, through its Directors.

3.       Syndicate Bank, SCO No. 27, Sector-11, Panchkula, Through its Branch Manager.

                                                                                      ….….Opposite Parties

          Complaint under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act.

 

Before:        Mr. Satpal, President.    

                   Dr. Pawan Kumar Saini, Member.

                   Dr. Sushma Garg, Member.

                  

Present:       Sh. Shammi Saroha, Advocate, Counsel for the Complainant.

                   Sh. Raj K. Narang, Advocate, Counsel for OPs No. 1 & 2.

                   Sh. Randeep Singh, Advocate, Counsel for OP No. 3.

 

           Today the case is fixed for arguments. At this stage the Ld. counsel for the complainant on the instructions of the complainant, by making a separate statement, stated that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties; hence, withdraws the present complaint, being fully satisfied.

           Heard. In view of the statement made by the Ld. counsel for the Complainant, the present complaint is hereby ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, being fully satisfied.

                   A copy of this order be sent to the parties, free of costs and file be consigned to the record room, after due compliance.

 

Dt.              (Dr. Sushma Garg)         (Dr.Pawan Kumar Saini)           (Satpal)

                   29.09.2022         Member                     Member                                President