Kerala

Kottayam

CC/143/2015

Ramesh Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Finance - Opp.Party(s)

Vinu Jacob Mathew

31 Jan 2017

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/143/2015
 
1. Ramesh Kumar
Kochumanalel House Chengalam South P.O.
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Bajaj Finance
Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd. 2nd Floor, Kurup Tower Kodimatha
Kottayam
Kerala
2. Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd.
Regional Office, No.2A Bharani Business Centre 2nd Floor, Dr. Banumathi Ramakrishna Road Saligram, Chennai
Tamilnadu
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Bose Augustine PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Renu P. Gopalan MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:Vinu Jacob Mathew, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 31 Jan 2017
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOTTAYAM

Present:

Hon’ble Mr. Bose Augustine, President

        Hon’ble Mr. K.N. Radhakrishnan, Member

Hon’ble Mrs.Renu.P.Gopalan, Member

CC No.143/2015

Tuesday the 31st  day of January, 2017.

 

Petitioner                                          :        Ramesh Kumar,

                                                                   S/o. Vasudevan.

                                                                   Kochumanalel House,

                                                                   Chengalam South P.O

                                                                   Kottayam.

                                                                    (Adv. Vinu Jacob Mathew)

                                                          Vs.                                                                                           

Opposite parties                               : 1)    Bajaj Finance,

                                                                   Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd.,

                                                                   2nd Floor, Kurup Tower,

                                                                   Kodimatha, Kottayam

                                                                   PIN – 686039.

                                                                    

                                                         2)      Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd.,

                                                                   Regional Office, No. 2A,

                                                                   Bharani Business Centre,

                                                                   2nd Floor, Dr. Bhanumathi

                                                                   Ramakrishna Road,

                                                                   Saligramam, Chennai-93.

                                                                   (Adv. Francis Thomas)

                                                                    

                                                O R D E R

 

Hon’ble Mr. Bose Augustine, President

 

                The case of the complainant filed on 02/06/2015 is as follows:

            The complainant availed a loan for Rs, 1,05,000/- from the opposite party  finance company for purchasing Bajaj Goods Carrier  three wheeler vehicle.  As per  the loan agreement the EMI amount is Rs.3856/- as 36  instalment and the agreed rate of interest is Rs. 9% per annum.  And opposite party had collected 36 cheques of the complainant,  promissory note and other documents. The  hire purchase was noted in the RC book of the vehicle.  According to the complainant he had remitted all the EMI’s properly and they collected other amounts on various grounds.  Then the complainant requested to the  opposite party to issue the No Objection Certificate.  But opposite party had  not cared to issue the NOC.  So he could not transferred or  demolish the said vehicle.  According to the complainant the  said act of opposite parties amounts to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.  Hence this complaint.

            Opposite parties filed version admitting the issuance of the vehicle loan to the complainant.  According to the opposite parties as per the request of the complainant for extending financial assistance  for purchase of a three wheeler goods carrier vehicle they had agreed to extend financial facility to the  tune of Rs. 1,38,816/- including financial charges of Rs. 33,816/-, for 36 months with interest @ 9.99% per annum.  And on 27/10/2005 the complainant was executed loan agreement No. 451050067 in favour of the opposite party company.  The EMI to be paid is Rs. 3,856/- payable  every 7th of respective months starting  from 07/12/2005.  And the  complainant has opted/chosen  post dated cheques as one of the repayment mode as per his conveyance for remittance of respective  month loan instalments without  any delay of default through bank account and issued 36 numbers of  filled and signed post dated cheques as payment mode/facility for prompt repayment of monthly instalments.  According to the opposite parties the complainant has not remitted the EMI’s  is in time as per the loan agreement.  So as per the clause II(a) of agreed terms and conditions of the loan  agreement other over dues charges was accumulated  in the loan account due to non remittance of instalments on its due dates.  And as per the statement  of account on 03/11/15, there was an arrear of Rs. 7965/- towards other  over due charges and complainant is liable to pay the said amount.  So No Objection Certificate was not issued.  According to the opposite party  they had acted  as per the terms and conditions of loan agreement and there is no  deficiency in service or unfair trade practice on the part of opposite parties.  And opposite parties prayed for dismissal of the complaint with cost.

Points for considerations are:

1)        Whether there is any deficiency in service or unfair trade practice on the

part of opposite parties?

2)        Relief and cost.

            Evidence in this case consists of the proof affidavit of both sides and Ext. A1 to A4 documents from the side  of the  complainant and Ext. B1 and B2 documents from the side of opposite parties.

Point No. 1

            The crux of the complainants’ case is that even after remitting all the EMI amounts with other charges on various heads of his vehicle loan, the opposite parties has not  issued the NOC.  According to the opposite parties the complainant has not remitted the EMI’s in time and as per  the loan agreement he is to be remitted over due charges, which is due to non remittance of instalments on  its due dates.  As per the statement of account on 03/11/15, there was an arrear of Rs. 7965/- towards   other overdue charges and the complainant is liable to pay the said amount.  Opposite parties produced the copy of the disputed loan account statement and the same is marked as Ext. B2.  In Ext. B2  the amount to be remitted by the complainant is shown as Rs. 1,51,252/-. The complainant has remitted Rs. 1,47,092/-.  The over due charges due is shown as Rs. 12,600/- and paid by the complainant is shown as

Rs.  11,070/-. Bounce charge due is shown as Rs. ‘00’.  That is   ‘Zero balance’.   In the version the specific case of the opposite party is that complainant is liable to pay Rs. 7965/- towards over due charges.  However,  the amount in the version is  not tallying  with Ext. B2 statement  of account.  So opposite parties failed to prove their contention.  Further more opposite parties admitted that the entire instalments were remitted by the complainant.  In our view act of opposite party in not issuing the NOC to the complainant amounts to  deficiency in service.  Point No. 1 is found accordingly.

Point No. 2

            In view of the finding in point No. 1 .  Complaint is  allowed.   In the result:

  1. Opposite parties are  ordered to issue ‘No Objection Certificate’ to the

complainant pertaining to the vehicle vide Reg.No. KL-05/U7730 goods carriage.

  1.  Opposite parties are ordered to pay Rs. 2,000/- as compensation and

Rs.  2000/- as litigation cost to the complainant.

            The order shall be complied with within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy order.  If not complied as directed, the award amount will carry 15% interest from the date of order till realization.

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the  31st  day of January ,  2017.

Hon’ble Mr. Bose Augustine, President           Sd/-

Hon’ble Mr. K.N. Radhakrishnan, Member    Sd/-

Hon’ble Mrs.Renu.P.Gopalan, Member          Sd/-

                                                     Appendix

Documents for the petitioner:

Ext. A1: Original receipt (20 Nos)

Ext. A2: Original Bank pass Book.

Ext. A3: Copy of  R.C Book.

Ext. A4: Copy of letter  Dtd: 21/05/2014.

Documents for the opposite parties

Ext. B1: Copy of  terms and conditions  governing agreement with

              Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd.

Ext. B2: Copy of statement of account Dtd: 03/11/2000.

 By Order,

Senior Superintendent

  •  
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Bose Augustine]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Renu P. Gopalan]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.