Haryana

Yamunanagar

CC/3/2020

Kuldeep Kumar S/o Rameshwar Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Finance Lit. - Opp.Party(s)

Complainant inperson

13 Feb 2020

ORDER

CC No. 03 of 2020

Kuldeep Kumar versus Bajaj Finance

 

Present:    Complainant in person.

                 Shri Sumit Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1.

                 Shri Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

                                               

               Written statement not filed by the respondent No. 1. However, same has been filed by the respondent No. 2. Copy of the same supplied to the opposite counsel. As per the written statement filed by the respondent No.2, the complainant is entitled for his claim to the extent of Rs.7118/- only and this fact has been admitted by the complainant also in para No. 4 of the complaint.

                According to the respondent No.2, same has not been credited into the account of the complainant due to invalid IFS Code and except the invalid IFS Code, there remains no dispute between the parties and IFS Code. In order to disclose the IFS Code placed on record copy of the cancelled cheque pertaining to his account maintained in Earst while Bank of Patiala. The photocopy of the same is retained on the record. The while Earst State Bank of Patiala has been merged into the State Bank of India, quite obvious, relating to change of IFS Code and in order to rule out the possibility of any further mistake, it would be better if the respondent No.2 makes the payment of Rs.7118/- through account payee cheque in favour of the complainant.

                Since, the respondent No.2 has not disputed the entitlement of the complainant to the extent of Rs.7118/-, without commenting anything adverse on the act and conduct any of the respondents, complaint is accepted and the respondent No.2 is held liable to make payment of Rs.7118/- to the complainant through account payee cheque, within the period of 30 days from today, in default of it, respondent No.2 shall be liable to pay interest @ 7% per annum on the said amount of Rs.7118/- from the date of order till actual realization, in addition to its provision of Section 25/27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 may be invoked against the respondent No.2 on the application of the complainant. Complaint qua respondent No.1 is dismissed. In order to maintain the balance both the parties are left to bear their own costs of litigation. File be consigned to the records.  

 

                                                                                President,

                                                                             DCDRF, YNR.

                                                                   Distt & Sessions Judge (VRS)

             L.Member           Member                        13.02.2020.