Haryana

Karnal

CC/359/2022

Preekshit Sansarval - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Finance Limited - Opp.Party(s)

29 Sep 2023

ORDER

 BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.359 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.24.06.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:29.09.2023

 

Preekshit Sansarval son of Sh. Gulab Singh R/o house no.121, Sector-13, Extn. Urban Estate, Karnal.

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1. Bajaj Finance Limited, SCO-225, 2^nd floor, Near Domino’s, Sector-12, Karnal, through its Branch Manager.
2. Canara Bank, branch at Sector-12, Karnal.

 

                        ....Opposite parties.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

               

Present:   None for the complainant.

                Sh. Naveen Khetarpal, proxy counsel for the OP-1.

                Sh. Sudarshan Chaudhary, counsel for the OP-2.

                                 

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the last opportunity. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. Position remained the same on the adjourned date. It is already 04:00 PM. No further wait is justified.

                A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs on 06.09.2022 and the case was adjourned for evidence of complainant. Thereafter, the complainant has availed several effective opportunities including last two opportunity for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.

                Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:29.09.2023.            

                    President,       

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member