Haryana

Karnal

CC/221/2020

Nitish Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Finance Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Naveen Khetarpal

26 Oct 2020

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

 

                                                                     Complaint No.221 of 2020

                                                                     Date of instt. 26.6.2020

                                                                      Date of Decision 26.10.2020

 

Nitish Kumar son of Shri Raman Nagpal, resident of H.No.23, Subhash Colony, Near Shakha Ground, Karnal.

                                                                             …….Complainant

                                      Versus

 

1.       Bajaj Finance Limited, Branch (Bajaj Finserv) Office, Sector-12, Karnal, through its Manager/Authorised Person (Performa respondent)

2.       Deep Associates Authorised Service Centre of Samsung India Electronics, At Shop No.20, 21, 22, Asa Ram Market, Model Town, Karnal, through its authorized person/owner.

3.       Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd 2^nd to 4^th Floor, Vipul Tech Squere Sector-43, DLF Golf Course Road, Gurgaon, 122002, through its authorized signatory.

                                                                             …..Opposite parties

 

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.        

 

 

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh……President.      

      Sh.Vineet Kaushik ………..Member

                Dr. Rekha Chaudhary…….Member

 

 

 Present:   Shri Naveen Khetarpal, counsel for complainant.

                   Shri Amit Sachdeva, counsel for OP No.1.

                   Shri Dheeraj Sachdeva, counsel for OP No.3

                    

                    An application for put up the case file and for withdrawing the present complaint has been filed. Keeping in view the facts mentioned in the application and in the interest of justice, application stands allowed.

File taken up.

                   Learned counsel for OP No.3 filed written version on behalf of OP No.3. Copy supplied.

                   Learned counsel for complainant made a statement that the matter has been compromised with the OPs, therefore, he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraws the same.

                In view of statement of learned counsel for complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

 

Announced
Dated:26.10.2020

 

   President,               

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.                                                

 

(Vineet Kaushik)           (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

       Member                                  Member