Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/826/2011

Sri.M.Chandra Sekhar Rao S/o late appaiah, aged about 86 yrs., Occ:Advocate - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Electronics, REp. by its Br. Manager, - Opp.Party(s)

M/s K.Pallavi

24 Aug 2012

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/826/2011
(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/08/2011 in Case No. CC/134/2011 of District Hyderabad-III)
 
1. Sri.M.Chandra Sekhar Rao S/o late appaiah, aged about 86 yrs., Occ:Advocate
R/o H.No. 1-10-20, Ashok nagar, Hyderabad
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Bajaj Electronics, REp. by its Br. Manager,
6-3-669, Ground floor, OZone complex, Panjagutta, beside Hyderabad cetral, Hyderabad
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER
 

 

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: AT HYDERABAD.

 

FA.No.826/2011 against CC. No.134/2011 District Consumer Forum-III, Hyderabad.

 

Between:

 

Sri Movva Chandra Sekhar Rao,

S/o.late Appaiah,

Aged about 86 years, Occ: Advocate,

R/o.H.No.1-10-20, Ashok Nagar,

Hyderabad – 20.

…Appellant/Complainant.

And

Bajaj Electronics,

Rep. by its Branch Manager,

6-3-669, Ground Floor,

Ozone Complex, Panjagutta,

Beside Hyderabad Central,

Hyderabad-500 082.

…Respondent/Opp.Party.

 

Counsel for the Appellant          :  M/s.K.Pallavi.

Counsel for the Respondent     :  M/s.Gopi Rajesh & Associates.

 

 

QUORUM: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT,

SMT.M.SHREESHA, HON’BLE MEMBER,

AND

SRI S.BHUJANGA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER.

 

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST,

TWO THOUSAND TWELVE.

Oral Order (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President)

*******

This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant against the order of dismissal of his complaint for default. 

The plea was that he was suffering from typhoid and could not go the Forum to represent the matter.

Considering the fact that the complainant is aged about 89 years, an advocate, and the complaint being dismissed for default, we are of the opinion that one more chance could be given to the complainant in order to pursue the matter.  Since the opposite party has put in its appearance through counsel, both parties are directed to appear before the District Forum on 10.09.2012 without insisting for fresh notice.

The District Forum is directed to restore the complaint to its original file and direct the opposite party to file its written version within the time stipulated and after receiving affidavit evidence from both sides dispose off the matter within three months from the date of this order. 

            The appeal is disposed off accordingly.  No costs.                                                                             

 

 

 

(PRESIDENT)                 (MEMBER)                (MEMBER)

                                            

                                            24/08/2012.

vvr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.