NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSALCOMMISSION

NEW DELHI

REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 167 OF 2011

IN

REVISION PETITION Nos. 3287 AND 3288 of 2010

(From the Order dated 01.02.10 in Appeal No.1382 & 2515 of 2006  of the State Commission, Madhya Pradesh)

Purushottom Shankar Mishra                             …Petitioner

           Versus

Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd. & Anr.                          …Respondents

BEFORE: -

 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT

           HON’BLE  MRS. VINEETA  RAI,  MEMBER

IN CHAMBER

31.10.2011

O R D E R

Petitioner has filed this Review Application seeking review of order dated 23.08.11 by which the Revision Petitions filed by the Petitioner were dismissed and the order of the State Commission was upheld.  It was held that the Respondent could re-possess the vehicle as the Petitioner defaulted in making the payment.  That the vehicle was sold after issuing the pre-sale notice.

An order can be reviewed only if there is a mistake apparent on the face of the record.  We have dismissed the Revision Petitions on the basis of evidence present on record. We do not find any mistake apparent on the face of the record. No ground for review is made out.  Dismissed. 

Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Petitioner.

…………………………………….

(ASHOK  BHAN J.)

PRESIDENT

…………………………………………

(VINEETA  RAI)

MEMBER

YD/*