Chandigarh

DF-I

EA/54/2010

Surinder Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd. SCO No. 56 - Opp.Party(s)

24 Sep 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 54 of 2010
1. Surinder KumarS/o Sh. Natha Ram aged 51 Yrs. R/o House No. 1128, Sector-67 Mohali ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd. SCO No. 56Second Floor Sector26 Madhy Marg Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 24 Sep 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

           

                                                Execution Application No.  54 of 2010

                                                            In

Consumer Complaint no. 1546 of 2009

 

Surinder Kumar, S/o Sh. Natha Ram, r/o H. NO. 1128, Sector 67, Mohali.

                                                                                                              - Complainant

                                                Versus

 

Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd., S.C.O. No. 56, Second Floor, Sector 26, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh.

-          Opposite Party

 

Present:           Complainant/DH in person.

                        Sh.Balwinder Singh, Advocate for OP.

 

Dated, the 24th day of September, 2010.

                                                            ORDER

 

                            This case has been taken up today in the Lok Adalat. The parties have settled the dispute and made statement which is reproduced as under:-

             “Statement of Sh.Balwinder Singh, Advocate for OP.

 

The complainant has been paid Rs.32,700/- by way of payinst cheque no.554330 dated 17.09.2010 drawn on HDFC Bank in his name  and therefore his claim against the OP-company stands fully satisfied and nothing remains due and NO Due Certificate against the proposal number 424102725 and 424103925 is also handed over to the complainant/DH. Thus, the present execution may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn.

 

            Statement of Sh.Surinder Kumar, complainant/DH.

 

I have received Rs.32,700/- by way of payinst cheque no.554330 dated 17.09.2010 drawn on HDFC Bank in my name  and therefore my claim against the OP-company stands fully satisfied and nothing remains due and NO Due Certificate against the proposal number 424102725 and 424103925 is also handed over to me. Thus, the present execution may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn”.

 

2.                     In view of the above statements, the execution application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

 

3.                     Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.                                      

 

 

PRESIDING MEMBER

                      LOK ADALAT.

 

                        2nd MEMBER                                   1st MEMBER



DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,