Haryana

Karnal

CC/332/2019

Dalbir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Sandeep Chauhan

12 May 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint No.332 of 2019

                                                          Date of instt.13.06.2019

                                                          Date of Decision:12.05.2022

 

Dalbir son of Deva Ram, resident of village Thambu pana Village Jaisingh Pura Tehsil Assandh, District Karnal.                                          

…….Complainant

                                        Vs

  1. Bajaj Allianz Insurance company Ltd. GE Plaza 5th floor, B-Wing Airport Road Yerawada Pune Maharastra 411006.
  2. Bajaj Allianz Insurance company Ltd. ½ floor, SCO No.226 Sector-12 Karnal 132001 through Branch Manager.

                                                                        …..Opposite parties.

Complaint under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

        Smt. Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

 

Present: Shri Sandeep Chauhan, counsel for the complainant.

Shri Vikas Bakshi, counsel for the OPs.

                 

                Today the case was fixed for evidence of the OPs and compromise. Compromise effected.

                 Learned counsel for the OPs has suffered a separate statement to the effect that matter has been compromised between the parties and as per the compromise, OPs are ready to pay Rs.19 lacs being the sum assured and Rs.25,000 over and above the sum assured. The compromise amount will be paid by the opposite parties within 45 days from the date of passing the order.  

                On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant also suffered his separate a statement to the effect that the matter has been compromise with the OPs and as per the statement of the learned counsel for the OPs he does not want to pursue the present complaint further and withdraws the same.

               In view of statement of the learned counsel for both parties, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn being compromised. Both the parties would be governed by the statement made by their respective counsels. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:12.05.2022             

                        President,  

District Consumer Disputes                                                      

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.