Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/388/2021

Badarudeen A - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Allianz general insurance - Opp.Party(s)

27 Apr 2022

ORDER

                 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

      SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

    SMT.PREETHA G NAIR: MEMBER

                                                                                  SRI.VIJU.V.R                : MEMBER

 

CC.NO.239/20 (Filed on :10.11.2020)

ORDER DATED :27/04/2022

COMPLAINANT

Edwin.D

Kavuvila puthen veedu, Piravilakom,
Venganoor.P.O, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 523

 

(Party in person)

VS

OPPOSITE PARTY

          Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd,

          Rep.by its General Manager,

          TC.83/C2133, Anugraha, M.G.Road,

          Pazhavangadi, Thiruvananthapuram

          Kerala State – 695023

         

          (By Adv.Rinu.S.Aswan)

         

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN        : PRESIDENT

              This complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

 

                     2.     This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite party and the same was accepted by the opposite party and accordingly entered appearance before this Commission and sought time for settling the matter. When the case came up for consideration today a memo of settlement was filed by both the parties. The said memo of settlement contains the signature of both parties. The memo of settlement filed by the parties to the dispute is accepted and recorded. As per the memo of settlement the matter was settled for Rs.41,000/- (Rupees forty one thousand only) and the same has to be deposited by the opposite party within three months from the date of receipt of this order failing which the amount shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the order.

              In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the dispute, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled.

              In the result, the complaint is dismissed as settled. The memo of settlement signed by both parties dated 25.04.2022 shall form part of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

             A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

                 Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 27^th day of April 2022.

•  

P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                                    Sd/-

PREETHA G NAIR: MEMBER

 

                                                                                                   Sd/-

                                                            VIJU.V.R         : MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Be/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT

 CONSUMER DISPUTES

REDRESSAL COMMISSION

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

CC.NO.388/2021

ORDER DATED :27.04.2022