NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2525/2013

DHANI CHAND - Complainant(s)

Versus

BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & 2 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MS. VIDHUSHI SHARMA

16 Dec 2013

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2525 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 05/04/2013 in Appeal No. 54/2012 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)
1. DHANI CHAND
S/O SH.RAM CHAND SUKH, R/O V.P.O. PANGI KALPA
KINNAUR
H.P
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & 2 ORS.
THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANGER, GE PLAZA AIRPORT ROAD,YERWADA
PUNE - 411006
MAHARASTRA
2. SH.VIKRAM THAKUR INSURENCE CBAJAJ ALLIANCE INSURENCE CO LTD.,
SAHNI COMPLEX RAJGARH ROAD,
SOLAN
H.P - 173212
3. SUKH URAN, S/O SH MANGU RAM URAN,
VPO RECONPEO TEHSIL KALPA
KINOR
H.P
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
For the Petitioner : Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent :
For the Respondents : Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate

Dated : 16 Dec 2013
ORDER
PER JUSTICE J.M. MALIK

 

1.      Counsel for the petitioner present.  Counsel for the Respondent No.1 is present.  Respondents –2 & 3 not served.  It is reported that R-2 has left the given address.  Notice from the Respondent-3 has come back with the postal remarks that the address is incomplete. Counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondents No. 2 & 3 are the proforma parties and the petitioner has not claimed any relief against them.

2.      We have also perused the impugned order. Respondents No. 2 & 3 did not appear before the State Commission.

The order of the State Commission runs as follows:-

 

“None is present for the respondents No. 2 & 3.

Nobody appears for the revision petitioner.  Matter was taken up earlier also.  That time, nobody appeared for him.  It has been taken up again after the day’s cause list exhausted.;  This time also, nobody is present for the revision petitioner.  Hence, the petition is dismissed in default of appearance of the revision petitioner.”

 

3.      We have heard the arguments.  Counsel for the petitioner explains that the counsel for the petitioner could not appear before the State Commission as the counsel Ms. Vidushi Sharma was busy before the High Court.  She asked her colleague Ms.
Anita to appear before the State Commission but she did not appear and the case was dismissed in default.  This shows the negligence, inaction and passivity on the part of Advocate Ms. Vidushi Sharma.  It is also stated that thereafter, now they have changed the advocate. 

4.      In the interest of justice, we allow the Revision Petition and set aside the order passed by the State Commission subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- as costs, which will be deposited with the Consumer Welfare Fund established by the Central Government  under  Section 12 (3)   read   with    Rule 10(a)  of the  Consumer  Protection  Act, 1986,  of   the Central     Excise Act,   1944,   by way  of demand draft in favour  of  Pay and Accounts Officer, Ministry of Consumer Affairs,  payable at New Delhi.   To make the thing easier, the petitioner can deposit the demand draft with the Registrar of this Commission, who will further transmit the demand draft to the concerned Ministry. 

5.      Parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 28.01.2014.  The State Commission will see that the above said costs stand paid and try to expedite the case expeditiously.

6.      The Revision Petition stands disposed of.

 

 
......................J
J.M. MALIK
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.