This revision petition has been filed with a delay of 119 days which is over and above the statutory period of 90 days given for filing the revision petition.  Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 the consumer fora are required to decide the case in a summary manner within 90 days of its filing where no evidence is required to be

-2-

taken and within 150 days where the evidence is required to be taken.  In the present case, the delay of 119 days over and above the statutory period given for filing the revision petition cannot be condoned without showing sufficient cause.  We are not satisfied  with the cause shown.  Application for condonation of delay is dismissed. 

Otherwise also, we have considered the revision on merits.   The petitioner, who had got the Health Guard Policy from the respondent, got herself operated for removal of her cyst.  The State Commission has set aside the order of the District Forum and held that the operation relating to the cyst is excluded under the policy.

We have gone through the Exclusion Clause and agree with the view taken by the State Commission.  Dismissed on merits as well.  No costs.