Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. V/S Shakti Feed Industries - Consumer Court Case

Punjab

Bhatinda

EA/08/19

Shakti Feed Industries - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Vinod Garg Advocate

10 Jun 2008

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
Execution Application(EA) No. EA/08/19

Shakti Feed Industries						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh. Sham Lal son of Sh.Wailati Ram Residsent Mehraj Phul,on oath & Sh.Vind Kumar,counsel for the complainant W.O. Since appeal No.181 of 2008 has been preferred by the opposite parties against the order passed by this Forum and in that appeal,operation of the order has been stayed on the basis of misc.applications No.283 &284 of 2008, complianants do not want to proceed with complaint under section 25&27 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 at this stage. They may proceed as per order of the Hon'ble State Commission.This complaint may be dismissed as withdrawn. RO&AC Member President, D.C.F. 10.6.08 Presesnt: Sh.Sham Lal,complainant in person with counsel Sh.Vinod Kumar Garg,Advocate Sh.Sanjay Goyal,counsel for the opposite parties. In view of the above statement made by Sh.Sham Lal complainant and learned counsel for the complianants, this complaint under section 25&27 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 is dismissed as withdrawan. Parties are left to bear their own costs. File be consigned. Member President, D.C.F

Statement of Sh. Sham Lal son of Sh.Wailati Ram Residsent Mehraj Phul,on oath & Sh.Vind Kumar,counsel for the complainant W.O. Since appeal No.181 of 2008 has been preferred by the opposite parties against the order passed by this Forum and in that appeal,operation of the order has been stayed on the basis of misc.applications No.283 &284 of 2008, complianants do not want to proceed with complaint under section 25&27 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 at this stage. They may proceed as per order of the Hon'ble State Commission.This complaint may be dismissed as withdrawn. RO&AC Member President, D.C.F. 10.6.08 Presesnt: Sh.Sham Lal,complainant in person with counsel Sh.Vinod Kumar Garg,Advocate Sh.Sanjay Goyal,counsel for the opposite parties. In view of the above statement made by Sh.Sham Lal complainant and learned counsel for the complianants, this complaint under section 25&27 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 is dismissed as withdrawan. Parties are left to bear their own costs. File be consigned. Member President, D.C.F