West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

MA/30/2024

Partha Sarathi Sen - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

25 Apr 2024

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)
8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.
Web-site - confonet.nic.in
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/30/2024
( Date of Filing : 07 Feb 2024 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/167/2020
 
1. Partha Sarathi Sen
S/o Late Sudhir Kumar Sen, At HO No. 72/8, Deshbandhu Road (East), P.O. - Alam Bazar, P.S. - Baranagar, Kolkata - 700035.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.
At Bajaj Allianz House, Airport Road, Yerawada, Pune - 411006. And At 164/1, Manicktala Main Road Mani Square 6th Floor Canal Circle Road, P.S. - Phool Bagan, Premises No. - 41, Kolkata - 700054.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Firoza Khatoon PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sailaranjan Das MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Maitreyee Chakraborty MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 25 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Order No. 3

Ld. Advocate for the complainant/petitioner is present.

Ld. Advocate for the opposite party is present and submits that he has received copy of Misc. Application.

Misc. Application dated 07/02/2024 is taken up for hearing.

Perused. Considered. Heard both side.

Ld. Advocate for the complainant prays for adding the necessary parties as opposite party nos.2 and 3 fully mentioned and described in the schedule of the application as they are necessary parties to this case.

Ld. Advocate for the opposite party raised strong objection against the prayer of the complainant and submits that evidence of opposite party has already been submitted at the fag end of the case. Complainant has come up with this application for adding Baine Hospital and Dr. Arindam Roy as opposite party to case. He further submits that the addresses of both the opposite parties given in the schedule are incorrect and prays for rejection of the application.

Ld. Advocate for the complainant/petitioner declines to give any reply to the objection of the opposite party.

It appears from the application that the address given in the schedule of the petition is incorrect.

No prayer made by the complainant/petitioner for amending the said incorrect address.

Therefore, Misc. Application dated 07/02/2024 is dismissed on contest without cost.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Firoza Khatoon]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sailaranjan Das]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Maitreyee Chakraborty]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.