Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

226/2014

S.Raja - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Alliance Life Insurance Co.Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

A.Venkatesh

21 Oct 2016

ORDER

 

 

                                                                            Complaint presented on:  20.11.2014

                                                                                Order pronounced on:  21.10.2016

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

    2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,        PRESIDENT

                    TMT.T.KALAIYARASI, B.A.B.L.:           MEMBER II

 

FRIDAY THE 21^st  DAY OF OCTOBER 2016

 

                                       C.C.NO.226/2014

 

 

Mr.S.Raja,

S/o.Samundi,

Sankarapuram Taluk,

Rishivanthiyam,

Villupuram Dist.

                                                                                     ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

 

1.Bajaj Alliance Life Insurance Company Limited,

No.497 & 498 4^th Floor,

Poonamalle High Road,

Manapakkam,

Arumbakkam, Chennai – 116.

 

2. The Manager,

Seera Solution,

No.883, MPH Road,

Padi, Chennai – 5

 

                                                                  …..Opposite parties

 

 

 

Date of complaint                                            : 05.12.2014

Counsel for complainant                       : M/s. A.Venkatesh

 

Counsel for 1^st Opposite Party                : M/s.S.Namasivayam

Counsel for 2^nd Opposite Party              :Dismissed (24.08.2015)

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

No representation for Complainant. Counsel for 1^st Opposite Party present. The Complainant has not filed proof affidavit till 3.00 p.m today inspite of posted today as last chance. Even prior to today’s hearing, to file proof affidavit 12 hearings chances were given. Inspite of sufficient opportunity given to the Complainant to file his proof affidavit, he has not chosen to file the same establishes that the Complainant has no interest in prosecuting the Complaint. Hence the Complaint is dismissed for default for non filing of proof affidavit. No costs.

Pronounced by us on this 21^st  day of  October  2016.

 

      -sd-                                                                                 -sd-     

MEMBER – II                                                              PRESIDENT