Kerala

Trissur

CC/13/433

Sam Vijayan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bajaj Alliance General Insurance co.Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

M R Arun

20 Sep 2013

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
AYYANTHOLE
THRISSUR-3
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/433
( Date of Filing : 11 Sep 2013 )
 
1. Sam Vijayan
20/155,Adiyatt Lane,Poothole p o,
Thrissur
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Bajaj Alliance General Insurance co.Ltd.
3rd floor city castle,East fort,
Thrissur
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:M R Arun, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 20 Sep 2013
Final Order / Judgement

Present:  1. Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President.

                                 2. Smt. Sheena.V.V, Member.

 

                                      11th day of October 2013

         

                                      C.C.433/13 filed on 7.9.13

 

Complainant:        Sam Vijayan, 20/155, Adiyat Lane,

                             Poothole.P.O, Thrissur.

                             (By Sri. M.R. Arun, Advocate, Thrissur-3)

 

Respondent:                    Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd,

                             3rd Floor, City Castle, East Fort, Thrissur-5.

                                               

                                                O R D E R

 

By Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President:

 

          Heard on admission and rejected.  The complaint is filed to get the repair charges of the autorickshaw of complainant from the respondent.  It is the case that on 2.9.2012 an accident was caused to the autorickshaw owned by complainant and damage was caused to the vehicle.  The police has registered a crime also.  This complaint is filed to get repair charge from the respondent.  But there is no cause of action against the respondent since no claim submitted with the respondent by demanding the amount.  It is the duty of complainant to submit claim in the claim form of the company and to demand the amount along with documents.  The company is the authority to process the claim and not the Consumer Forum.  The complaint is premature and there is no cause of action at all.  Hence the complaint is rejected.

 

 

 

                   

     Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum this the 11th day of October 2013.

 

                                                                             (Sd)

                                                                   Padmini Sudheesh, President.

 

                                                                             (Sd)

                                                                    Sheena.V.V, Member.                                                            

                                                Appendix

 

                                                                Nil

 

                                                                             (Id)

                                                                          President

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.