Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/24/2010

S.Hari Saravanan & 2 Ors. - Complainant(s)

Versus

B.G.Mohan Raja alias B.G.Mohan Raj - Opp.Party(s)

Baskar

22 Nov 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/24/2010
( Date of Filing : 05 Mar 2010 )
 
1. S.Hari Saravanan & 2 Ors.
NO. 239, OLD MAHABALIPURAM ROAD, KELAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 093
2. P. BABY
NO. 23, BHARATHIYAR STREET, KARAPAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 093
CHENNAI
TAMILNADU
3. K. SUNDARA BABU
NO. 239, OLD MAHABALIPURAM ROAD, KELAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 093
CHENNAI
TAMILNADU
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. B.G.Mohan Raja alias B.G.Mohan Raj
SOLE PROPRIETOR, G.M. CREATORS, THIRUVALLUVAR NAGAR, THIRUVANMIYUR, CHENNAI-600 041
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                             BEFORE   HON’BLE THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                 Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                           ::      MEMBER

 

CC. No. 24/2010

                                                           DATED THIS THE 22ND  DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

1.S.Hari Saravanan,

No.239, Old Mahabalipuram Road,

Kelambakkam, Chennai 600 093   

 

2. P.Baby

W/o Perumal,

No.23, Bharathiyar street,

Karapakkam, Chennai – 600 093  

 

3. K.Sundara Babu,

No.239, Old Mahabalipuram Road,

Kelambakkam, Chennai 600 093                              ..Complainants

 

                                             Vs

 

Mr. B.G.Mohan Raja @ B.G.Mohan Raj,

Sole Proprietor,

M/s G.M.Creators,

Thiruvalluvar Nagar,

Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai 600 041                          ..opposite party

 

Counsel for complainants                         : M/s K.Baskar

Counsel for opposite party                       : M/s Alexis Sudhakar

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :                                                           

                                       

                                                   Docket order

 

              No representation for Complainant and opposite party. Today this matter is posted for appearance of both and for arguments (list). When this matter was called at 10.30 a.m, there was no representation for complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.30 noon, the complainant was again not present. Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.

 

       Sd/-                                                                                                                      Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                             R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                                  PRESIDENT

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.