Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/91/2016

M/s. Hotel Ganesh - Complainant(s)

Versus

B. Mutheeswaran - Opp.Party(s)

V.S. Mannarsamy

12 Nov 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                                PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                              MEMBER

                                                                                            F.A. No.91/2016

(Against the order in C.C. No.139/2012, dated:15.04.2016 on the file of

D.C.D.R.F., Chennai (North))

                                                             DATED THE 12^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

1. M/s. HOTEL GANESH

rep. by its Prop. Mr. Maheswaran,

No.19, E.V.R. Periyar High Road,

Opp. Vaishnava College,

Arumbakkam,

Chennai – 600 106.        

2. Mr. Maheswaran,

Proprietor,

M/s. HOTEL GANESH

No. 19, E.V.R. Periyar High Road,

Opp. Vaishnava College,

Arumbakkam,

Chennai – 600 106.

3. Mr. Surya,

Manager,

M/s. HOTEL GANESH,

No.19, E.V.R. Periyar High Road,

Opp. Vaishnava College,

Arumbakkam,

Chennai- 600 106.                                                                                                .. Appellants / Opposite parties.

 

-Versus-

1. Mr.B. Mutheeswaran,

S/o. Balasubramanian,

No.2/129, M.S.K. Nagar,

R.S. Madai Post,

Ramanathapuram District.

 

2. Mr. K. Balasubramanian,

S/o. Kayambu Thevar,

No.2/129, M.S.K. Nagar,

R.S.Madai Post,

Ramanathapuram District.

(Impleaded as 2^nd

Complainant as per the order of this Hon’ble

Forum in C.M.P.No.37 of

2013 dated 3.4.2013)                                                                                          .. Respondents / Complainants

 

Counsel for the Appellants / opposite party 1 to 3         : M/s. V.S. Mannarsamy

Counsel for the Respondent / Complainant   1 & 2      : M/s. A. Mohan                                                                                                   

 

 

Docket order

 

            Appellant present. No representation for Respondent. Counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that they are withdrawing the appeal. In view of the memo the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Memo recorded.

Accordingly the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                      Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT