Assam

StateCommission

MA/36/2016

Megatron - Complainant(s)

Versus

B. D. Lab Solution - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. A. Gogoi

30 Jan 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/36/2016
In
First Appeal No. A/28/2016
 
1. Megatron
Apurba Path, By-lane 5, R. G. Baruah Road, Guwahati-781024 Represented by the Proprietor Mrs. Momita Goswami, R/o Narikalbari, Bye Lane 1, Sub Lane 2, Guwahati-781024, Kamrup, Assam
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. B. D. Lab Solution
Registered office at 301, Bhabendra Enclave, Naharani Path, Last Gate, Dispur, Guwahati-781006, Represented by the Proprietor Sri Bhudev Dutta, Rangpur Path, Zoo Road, Guwahati-781005, Kamrup, Assam
2. The Managing Director, DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd.
DTDC House, No. 3, Victoria Road, Bangalore-560047
Karnataka
3. The Regional Head, DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd.
Opposite ASTC Workshop, G. S. Road, Ulubari, Guwahati-781007
Kamrup
Assam
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. A. Gogoi, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. M. R. Islam,Advocate, for Mr. B. I. Khan, Advocate
Dated : 30 Jan 2017
Final Order / Judgement

            Heard A. Gogoi, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. M.R. Islam, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 2 and 3. Mr. Gogoi has placed a certificate obtained from the postal department in respect of proof of service upon respondent No.1 which would reveal that notice has already been delivered on 17-10-2016 and the same is marked as “X” for identification. None appeared for the respondent No. 1despite service of notice nor has filed any objection against the application for condonation of delay.

              This is an application for condoning the delay of 31 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. The grounds for delay has been explained at paragraphs 7 and 8 of the application. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath at paragraphs 7 and 8 of the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned.

              Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.