Delhi

StateCommission

A/958/2014

RASHMI SHARMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

AXIS BANK LTD. & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

25 Nov 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. A/958/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/103/2013 of District West Delhi)
 
1. RASHMI SHARMA
21, CHANDER NAGAR, A-BLOCK JANAK PURI N.D.-110058.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. AXIS BANK LTD. & ANR.
C4E, JANAK PURI N.D.-110058.
2. AXIS BANK LTD.
4/6B ASAF ALI ROAD DARYAGANJ DELHI-110002.
3. YAMUNA EXPRESS WAY INDUSTRIAL AUTHORITY
A-1 FIRST FLOOR COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, F-BLOCK, SEC-BETAII GREATER NOIDA-201308.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION :DELHI

(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

 

                                                                                                                 Date of Decision: 25.11.2014

                                    

First Appeal – 958/2014

 

Rashmi Sharma,

21, Chander Nagar,

A-Block, Janak Puri,

New Delhi-110058.

 

………Appellant

Vs

Axis Bank Ltd.,

C-4E, Janak Puri,

New Delhi-110058.

 

Axis Bank Ltd,

4/6B, Asaf Ali Road,

Daryaganj,

Delhi-110002.

 

Yamuna Express Way Industrial Development Authority,

A-1, First Floor, Commercial Complex,

F-Block, Sector-Beta II,

Greater Noida-201308.

……..Respondents

 

 

CORAM

 

Salma Noor, Member

NP Kaushik, Member(Judicial)

 

1.   Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment? 

2.   To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

 

NP Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

 

1.     Heard Ms Rashmi Sharma, the Appellant who is present in person.

2.      Contention of the Appellant is that the complaint filed by her in District Forum (III), Janak Puri, New Delhi was dismissed in default on 04.07.2014. 

 

3.      The reason for the absence of the appellant on the relevant day was that her husband had undergone a minor operation on 13th June, 2014 and thereafter he was admitted to a hospital for treatment of infection.  After being discharged he again got fever and on Ist July, 2014 his condition became serious.  On July 7, 2014 he was shifted to ICU and on 9th July, 2014 he expired.  In the circumstances and in the interest of justice, appeal is allowed setting aside the dismissal orders dated 04.07.14.  Case is remanded back to District Forum (III), Janak Puri, New Delhi with a direction to restore the complaint to its original number, and proceed in the case in accordance with law.  The Appellant/ Complainant is directed to appear before the District Forum (III), Janak Puri, New Delhi on 27.1.15.

5.   A copy of this order be sent to District Forum (III), Janak Puri, New Delhi for compliance.

 

 

                       

                      

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.