Haryana

Karnal

CC/161/2019

Kalinder Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Axis Bank Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Soun Kumar

09 Apr 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION KARNAL.

 

                                                         Complaint No.161 of 2019

                                                         Date of instt.18.03.2019

                                                         Date of decision:09.04.2021

 

Kalindri Singh widow of Mahesh Singh Chauhan resident of House no.B-18 CSSRI Campus Kachwa Road Karnal.

 

                                                                        …….Complainant.

                                        Versus

 

1. Axis Bank Ltd. Axis House, C-2 Wadhwa International Centre, Pandurang Budhakar Marg Worli Mumbai-400025.

2.  Branch Manager, Axiz Bank Ltd. 6-3-879/B, First Floor, G Pulla Reddy BL Greenlands, Begumpet Road Hyderabad-500016.

3. Branch Manager, Axis Bank Sector-12 Karnal.

                                                                     …..Opposite Parties.

 

        Complaint u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.     

 

Before   Shri Jaswant Singh……President.

             Shri Vineet Kaushik…..Member

             Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……Member

 

Present: Shri Sonu Kumar Advocate for complainant.

 

ORDER:                    

               

                Learned counsel of complainant made a statement for withdrawal of the complaint on account of technical defect, seeking permission to file afresh on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction.

              In view of statement of learned counsel of complainant the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction. In view of the law laid down Hon’ble Supreme Court in Laxmi Engineering Works Versus PSG Industries Institute (1995) 3 SCC 583 the complainant would be at liberty to get the benefit of provisions of section 14 of the Limitation Act, to exclude the period spent in prosecuting the present complaint before this Commission while computing the period of limitation prescribed for filing such complaint. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
Dated:09.04.2021                                                                   

                                                                  President,

                                                       District Consumer Disputes

                                                       Redressal Commission, Karnal.

         

(Vineet Kaushik)         (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)

                Member                           Member