DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
North 24 Pgs., BARASAT
C.C. No./21/2024
Date of Filing Date of Admission Date of Disposal
29.01.2024 NIL 11.11.2024
Complainant/s:- | Manikant Shaw, S/O-Lakshman Prasad Shaw, Resident of 125/4/359, Natun Pally Near- Star Bhaata, Shyamnagar, Rahuta (P), Dist-North 24 Parganas, West Bengal- 743127. P.o-Shyamnagan, Ps- Jagudalco. -Vs.- |
Opposite Party/s:- | 1. AVITA Technologies International Company Limited @ Avita Technologies Having registered office at No. 405, Copia Business Suites Tower A, 4th Floor, Jasola-110025, India. 2. Amazon Development Center, Having registered office at 26/1, Brigade Gateway Campus, Dr. Rajkumar Road, Malleshwaram West Bengaluru, Karnataka-560055. 3. Appario Retail Private Limited, Having registered office Plot-44, Arrjavv Industrial & Warehouse Park, Dankuni, near Coal India Complex, Hooghly. West Bengal-712310. |
P R E S E N T :- Sri. Daman Prosad Biswas……….President.
:- Sri. Abhijit Basu…………………. Member.
JUDGMENT /FINAL ORDER
Complainant above named filed this complaint against the aforesaid Opposite Parties praying for direction to refund the cost of Laptop amounting to Rs. 39,900/- along with interest @18% p.a., compensation amounting to Rs. 15,000/-, cost of the case amounting to Rs. 10,000/- and other reliefs.
Decisions with Reasons:-
Case was fixed for admission on 07/02/2024. But Complainant was absent without any steps. Case was adjourned for the ends of justice.
Next date was fixed on 19/02/2024. But on that date Complainant was absent without any steps. He did not file Show Cause.
Next date was fixed on 27/02/2024. But on that date Complainant was absent without any steps. He did not file Show Cause.
Next date was fixed on 03/10/2024. But on that date case was adjourned as per resolution of the Local Bar. Next date was fixed on 11/11/2024 i.e. today. But Complainant was absent without any steps. He did not file Show Cause on 11/11/2024.
Complainant did not produce original documents in support of his case so that this Commission is unable to decide this case on merit.
Contd. To Page No. 2 . . . ./
: : 2 : :
C.C. No./21/2024
The conduct of the Complainant indicates that he is not willing to proceed with this case. In this situation we have no other alternative but to dismiss the case.
In the result, present case fails.
Hence,
It is
Ordered:-
that the present case be and the same vide no. CC/21/2024 is dismissed ex-parte against the Opposite Parties but without any order as to costs being not admitted.
Let a copy of this order be supplied to both the parties free of cost as per CPR, 2005.
Dictated and Corrected by me
President
Member President
