Kerala

Kollam

CC/142/2019

Rajesh Kumar, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Authorised Officer, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.R.R.SAJEESH

08 Mar 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station , Kollam-691013.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/142/2019
( Date of Filing : 27 Jun 2019 )
 
1. Rajesh Kumar,
S/o.Rajanpillai,Sobhasadanam,Ozhukupara,Nedumgolam. Now residing at Kulathinkara Veedu,Pangonam Cherry,Mukhathala.P.O,Kollam.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Authorised Officer,
IFF Co-Tokio General Insurance Co.Ltd,IFF Co Sadan,CL District Centre Saket,New Delhi-110017.
2. Authorized Officer,
Neo Vision Tours and Travels Pvt.Ltd Reg.No.B0566/AP/COM/1000 /5/8959/2013 2-3-35/3/1,6 Number Circle,Amberpet,Hydrabad-500013, Telagana.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL  COMMISSION, KOLLAM

Dated this the   8th   Day of  March      2022

  Present: -  Sri. E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LL.M. President

        Smt.S.Sandhya Rani, Bsc, L.L.B,Member

        Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A.LLB, Member

                                                                          CC.142/2019

 

Rajesh Kumar                                                       :           Complainant

S/o Rajan Pillai

Sobha Sadanam,Ozhukupara, Nedungolam

Now residing at

Kulathinkara Veedu,Pangonam Cheri

Mukhathala P.O, Kollam.

[By Adv.R.R.Sajeesh]

V/s

  1. Authorised Officer                                         :           Opposite parties

         IFF CO-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.

       IFF COSadan, CL District Centre

      Saket, New Delhi-110017.

       [By Adv.S.Dileep Kumar]

  1. Authorised Officer

          Neo Vision Tours and Travels Pvt. Ltd.

Reg.No.B0566/AP/COM/1000+/5/8959/2013 2-3-35/3/1,6 Number Circle, Amberpet, Hydrabad-500013, Telangana.

FINAL   ORDER

E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LL.M, President

            Complainant absent.  Opposite parties represented.  Complainant’s Advocate also absent.  No application is filed seeking adjournment or to remove the case from the list.  In the result we are of the view that the complainant is not interested in proceeding with the complaint.

          In the result complaint stands dismissed for default.

          No costs.

          Dated this the  8th   day of    March   2022.

E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim:Sd/-

            S.Sandhya Rani:Sd/-

             Stanly Harold:Sd/-

              Forwarded/by Order

             Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.