Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/529/2020

Puneet Chhabra - Complainant(s)

Versus

Athelonics Gym - Opp.Party(s)

Yuvraj Singh Aulakh Adv

09 Jul 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.

:

529/ 2020

Date of Institution

:

12.10.2020

Date of Decision    

:

09.07.2021

 

                                       

                                               

Puneet Chhabra s/o Sandeep Chhabra r/o H.No.1028, Sector 43-B, Chandigarh.

                                ...  Complainant.

Versus

Athelonics Hybrid Gym,  SCO 146-148, Main Road, Sector 43-B, Chandigarh-160043  through its Owner.

…. Opposite Party

BEFORE:

SHRI RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT

SMT.PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBER

SHRI B.M.SHARMA, MEMBER

 

Argued by

                Sh.Manjot Singh Rai, Adv. for the complainant

                OP exparte.

 

PER RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT

  1.         By dint of this common order, we propose to dispose of the following two (2) connected consumer complaints in which common questions of law and fact are involved:-

1

2

3

4

Sr.

No.

C.C. No.

Parties Name

Amount  deposited (In Rs.)

  1.  

529/2020

Puneet Chhabra Vs. Athelonics Hybrid Gym

13,000/-

  1.  

531/2020

Pallak Chhabra Vs. Athelonics Hybrid Gym

13,000/-

  1.         The facts are gathered from Consumer Complaint No.529/2020- Puneet Chhabra Vs. Athelonics Hybrid Gym.
  2.           The facts of the case as alleged by the complainant are that on 03.03.2020, he enrolled for the membership of the OP-Gym by paying Rs.8,000/- and Rs.5,000/-.  On 11.03.2020, WHO had announced Covid-19 outbreak as pandemic because of which, the Chandigarh Administration directed closure of the Gyms. On 24.03.2020, the Central Govt. declared lockdown in India and on 05.08.2020, the Central Govt. allowed the gyms to reopen.   It has further been pleaded that for 142 days, the GYM was closed as ordered by the Central Govt. and inspite of this fact, the OP is not ready to adjust 142 days in the membership, despite his repeated requests. Alleging that the aforesaid acts of omission and commission on the part of the OP amount to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice, the complainant has filed the instant complaint.   
  3.         Notice sent for the service of the Opposite Party through process server was received back with the report of refusal. Since refusal was good service, and none appeared on behalf of the Opposite Party on the date fixed, therefore vide order dated 07.06.2021, it was proceeded against exparte. 
  4.         We have heard the learned Counsel for the complainant and have gone through the documents on record.
  5.         Admittedly, due to Covid-19 pandemic, the lockdown was enforced all over the country on the evening of 24.03.2020 by the Government of India as a preventive measure and to curb the spread of Corona virus due to which the gym of the OP remained closed till 04.08.2020 and even this fact has been admitted by the complainant in the complaint himself.
  6.          Needless to mention here that  the country is still reeling under the threats of covid-19 pandemic and its spread has not yet been controlled, thereby causing threats to life due to which lockdowns of varying stringency have been placed by the UT/State Governments from time to time to curb the spread of Corona virus. Under these circumstances, it cannot be said that the OP has committed any sort of deficiency in service or indulged into unfair trade practice by not rendering the promised services to the complainant, during that period
  7.         However, keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case(s), we are of the considered view that the ends of justice would be met if both the complaints are disposed of with a direction to the OP to render the services to the complainant(s) for the remaining 142 days as and when the restrictions imposed by the Government/Authorities are lifted and the gym of the OP become fully operational. We order accordingly.
  8.         In view of the above discussions, both the complaints are disposed of as stated above with no order as to costs.
  9.         Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties, free of charge. After compliance file be consigned to record room.

Announced

09.07.2021.                                                          

Sd/-

 (RAJAN DEWAN)

PRESIDENT

 

Sd/-

(PRITI MALHOTRA)

MEMBER

 

Sd/-

(B.M.SHARMA)

MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.