SMT.MOLYKUTTY MATHEW : MEMBER
The complainant has filed this complaint under sec.12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 seeking direction against the opposite party to stop the revenue recovery proceedings against the complainant and to pay compensation to the complainant. .
The case of the complainant in brief.
The complainant submits that he is having consumer ID NO. 4232102230 of KWA Taliparamba section. The complainant has taken a domestic water connection from the JICA water supply scheme to his house situated at Karimbam,Taliparamba Muncipality. The complainant's property is situated in Panniyur Amsom, Poomangalam Desom, Ottapalanagar lying in RS No.21/2 having an extent of 5 cents. The complainant has taken the water connection on 4/6/2014 for domestic purpose only. He paid connection fittings for Rs.2981 dtd.29/4/14. The first meter reading was taken on 22/1/2015, and on 31/3/2015 the complainant has paid Rs.500/- as water charge. Then the 2nd reading was taken on 5/5/16 the amount shown in the bill for Rs.56,460/-. But the complainant surprised that he is not in a position to use the huge consumption of water. The complainant approached the office of the opposite party and informed that a coconut leaf fall on the pipe line, huge quantity of water was leaked out through his water connection due to breakage of pipeline. Then the complainant filed a petition before the opposite party for clear the extra bill amount . Thereafter on 24/9/16 the bill issued by opposite party for Rs.61060/-. Then the complainant appeared before opposite party and he states that some clerickal mistate caused to the bill. At last on 17/1/2017 the opposite party send a demand notie stating that the complainant if not paid the due amounts within 7 days of the receipt of this notice the water connection will be disconnected and to proceed other acts also. But the complainant states that he already reported the opposite party for leakage of the water. But no steps were taken by the opposite party to cure the leakage of the pipe. At last on 4/9/2018 the opposite party again issued the bill to the complainant for a total due amout of Rs.1,09,400/- . But the complainant states that for the last 2 year the complainant was not use the opposite party's water connection. Alleging that the above said acts amounts to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of opposite party. The complainant has filed the instant complaint.
After filing the complaint notice was issued to opposite party. appeared before the Fora and filed his written version and produced Exts.B1 to B3. Opposite party contended that the complainant is having more than 1 acres cultivating land. He is also using water from domestic line for irrigation illegally. But the opposite party has not proved the extend of property. No steps were taken for the same. Moreover opposite party states that there is no clerical error in the bill it is prepared through computer softeare and the complainant is liable to pay the bill also. Moreover the opposite party states that on accumulation of huge arrear as water charge and the consumer was not willing to remit even a part of it, the disconnection notice was issued to the complainant as a part of revenue recovery procedure and it is absolutely as per the normal procedure. There is no deficiency of service and unfair trade practice on his part and to dismiss the complaint.
Accordingly the complainant has to produced his chief afidavit in lieu of his chief examination and Exts.A1 to A4 produced . On complainant side he states that he approached the office of the opposite party and informed that a coconut leaf had fallen on the pipe line and 3 days huge quantity of water was leaked out through his water connection due to breakage of pipeline. No steps were taken by the opposite party. The opposite party has absolutely failed to cross examine the complainant nor adduced any reliable evidence against the complainant. From the forgoing discussion and findings we hold that there is deficiency of service on the part of opposite party. So the bill is not a legal one and the complainant has no liability to remit the arrear bill.
In the result, we the Fora allowed the complaint directing the opposite party to restrain the revenue recovery proceedings against the complainant regarding the arrear bill. This order to be complied by the opposite party within 30 days of receipt of this order. Failing which the complainant shall be at liberty to execute the order as per the provisions of Consumer Protection Act 1986.
Exts
A1 -copy of demand and disconnection notice
A2- Petition to Asst.Executive Engineer
A3-Tax receipt,
A4-photocopy of janmam document
B1. dt.17/1/17- Demand notice
B2- receipt
B3-Provisional approval notice
Sd/ Sd/
MEMBER PRESIDENT
eva /Forwarded by Order/
SENIOR SUPEINTENDENT