Kerala

StateCommission

RP/11/52

MARIYAMMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

ASST.EXE.ENGINEER,KSEB - Opp.Party(s)

CELINE JOSEPH

26 Sep 2011

ORDER

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Vazhuthacaud,Thiruvananthapuram
 
Revision Petition No. RP/11/52
(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/03/2011 in Case No. CC/10/66 of District Wayanad)
 
1. MARIYAMMA
AMBAKATTU HOUSE,APPLAM,NEDUMKARANA,RIPPON POST,MOOPAINAD VILLAGE,MEPPADI,WAYNAD
WAYNAD
KERALA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. ASST.EXE.ENGINEER,KSEB
KSEB,MAJOR SECTIION,VYTHIRI
WAYNAD
KERALA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

                                                                                                                     

      REVISION 52/2011

ORDER DATED 26.9.2011

 

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                --  PRESIDENT

SHRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR                    --  MEMBER

 

REVISION PETITIONER

 

Mariyamma

W/o Kurian, Ambakattu House,

Applam, Nedumkarana,

Rippon Post, Moopainad Village,

Meppadi, Wayanad District.

 

(By Adv. Celine Joseph)

 

Vs

 

RESPONDENTS

 

1.      The Assistant Executive Engineer

          Kerala State Electricity Board,

          Major Section, Vythiri.

 

2.      The Secretary

          Kerala State Electricity Board,

          Vythuthi Bhavan, Thiruvananthapuram.

 

3.      P. Musthafa, S/o Moideenkutty

          MP V/894, Ambakattu Quarters,

          Meppadi Post.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ORDER

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU,PRESIDENT

 

          Revision petitioner is the complainant in OP.59/06 and the petitioner in EA.66/10 in the file of CDRF, Wayanad. The complainant was directed to pay a sum of Rs.5000/- and the opposite parties were directed to give reconnection as per order in the I.A dated: 13.2.04.  The OP itself was disposed of on 6.2.08 as per which the order directing to remit Rs.5000/- was sustained and the bill issued by the opposite parties for Rs.22,000/- for the balance amount was cancelled. Evidently, the order of the Forum was very much beneficial to the complainant.   The Forum dismissed the EA as the complainant did not comply the order dated 13.2.04.

         

2.      It is the case of the revision petitioner/complainant that she was laid up and hence could not remit the amount   ie; Rs.5000/-.  Nothing has been produced to substantiate the case that she was laid up.  Further the complainant has not petitioned to the KSEB seeking extension of time to deposit the amount. 

 

3.      In the circumstances and in view of representation of the counsel that she is an aged lady the opposite parties/respondent is directed to receive the amount with interest at 12% from 13.2.04 and on receipt of the amount provide reconnection to the petitioner.  The amount is to be deposited within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order.  The revision petition is disposed of accordingly.

 

The office is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Forum.

 

 

JUSTICE  K.R.UDAYABHANU--  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR --  MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.