Kerala

Trissur

op/03/1095

P. J. Francis - Complainant(s)

Versus

Asst. Secretary - Opp.Party(s)

A. D. Benny

26 Jun 2008

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
AYYANTHOLE
THRISSUR-3
 
Complaint Case No. op/03/1095
( Date of Filing : 29 Dec 2003 )
 
1. P. J. Francis
25/2183, TSR
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Asst. Secretary
Electricity Wing , Thrsissur
2. Thrissur Corporation
Rep by Secretary
Trissur
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Rajani P.S. Member
 HON'BLE MR. Sasidharan M.S Member
 
PRESENT:A. D. Benny, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 M. Vinod and K. Suraj, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 26 Jun 2008
Final Order / Judgement

           9th   day of June 2011

                               OP.1095/03 filed on 29/12/03 

 

Complainant :       P.J.Francis, 25/2183, Consumer No.5447, Thrissur.

                             (By Adv.A.D.Benny, Thrissur)

 

Respondents  :      1. Assistant Secretary, Thrissur Corporation Electricity  

                                 wing, Thrissur Corporation, Thrissur.

                              2.Thrissur Corporation, rep. by Secretary, Thrissur   

   Corporation, Thrissur.

                              (By Adv. M.Vinod, Thrissur) 

                                                                                      

                                                ORDER

By Smt.Rajani.P.S., Member

            The complainant’s case is as follows: The complainant is a consumer of the respondents vide consumer No.5447 for room No.25/2183.  The complainant is using the said premises for earning his livelihood under self employment basis.  The complainant had paid regularly all the electricity charges and hence no chance for arrears.  But on 4/11/03 the respondents had issued a bill for Rs.14,168/- for the period upto 2/01.  They demanded an amount before April 1997.  In the calculation statement the respondents demanded Rs.18033/- including penal interest of Rs.3,860/-.  The said bill lacks any readings or calculations and also time barred.  The respondents informed that if the amount is not paid they will disconnect the supply.  Hence the complaint.

 

          2. The respondents were called absent and set exparte.

 

          3. To prove the case of the complainant he filed affidavit and produced Exhibits P1 and P2 documents.

 

          4. According to the complainant he regularly paid the charges of electricity.  So there is no scope for any dues.  But the respondents issued Exhibit P1 bill dated 4/1/03 for Rs.14,168/- and as per Exhibit P2 they have charged penal interest and demanded Rs.18,033/-.  The bill lacks supporting readings for the amount calculated.   Further they demanded an amount before April 1997 and hence the bill is barred by limitation vide  the Electricity Act.

 

          5. There is no evidence to the contrary.

 

          6. Exhibit P2 is the calculation statement issued by the respondent.  As per the same it can be seen that the arrears are with respect to the period from 4/97 to 2/01.  The bill has been issued on 4/11/03.  Evidently as per Section 56(2) no such due from any consumer shall be recoverable after the period of two years from the date of when such sum became first due unless such sum has been shown continuously as recoverable as arrears of charges for electricity supplied.  Hence Exhibit P1 bill has been issued for the period not recoverable as per Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act 2003, that came into force on 10/6/03.  There is no case that it has been shown continuously as recoverable as arrears of charges of  electricity.  Hence the respondents are not entitled to claim the Exhibit P1 and P2 amount vide Section 56(2).

 

          7. In the result the complaint is allowed and the Exhibit P1 and P2 bills stand cancelled.  No order as to cost and compensation.

 

            Dictated to the Confdl. Asst., transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum this the 9th  day of June 2011.

                                                                              

                                                                             Sd/- 

                                                                   Rajani.P.S., Member

                                                                             Sd/-                                                                                                             Padmini Sudheesh, President

                                                                             Sd/-                                                                                                             M.S.Sasidharan, Member

 

                                      Appendix

Complainant’s Exhibits

Ext. P1 Notice

Ext. P2 Calculation statement

 

                                                                             Id/-

                                                                                         Member

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Padmini Sudheesh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Rajani P.S.]
Member
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sasidharan M.S]
Member
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.