Rabindra Kumar Rout. filed a consumer case on 31 Oct 2019 against Asst. General Manager,SBI,Jajpur Town Branch. in the Jajapur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/53/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 04 Nov 2019.
IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JAJPUR.
Present: 1.Sri Pitabas Mohanty, I/C President,
2.Miss Smita Ray, Lady Member.
Dated the 31st day of October,2019.
C.C.Case No. 53 of 2017
Rabindra Kumar Rout ,
S/O Bishnu ch. Rout
At . Gothapur , P.O. Nakhei
Dist. Jajpur
……....Complainant .
(Versus)
At/P.O/ Dist. Jajpur.
……………..Opp.Parties.
For the Complainant: Sri R.C.Das, Advocate .
For the Opp.Parties : Sri P.K .Daspattnaik, Advocate.
Date of order: 31 .10. 2019.
SHRI PITABAS MOHANTY , PRESIDING MEMBER .
Deficiency in banking service is the grievance of the petitioner .
The facts as stated by the petitioner in the complaint petition in short is that the petitioner being an agriculturist in Similia G.P in the Dist. of Jajpur had taken a KCC loan of Rs. 33,000/ on dt. 10.08.2011 from O.P.1 for khariff season for 2011- 12 for agriculture purpose . The O.p.no.1 also debited the insurance premium to insured the khariff crops before the National Agricultural insurance which is compulsory under R.K.B.Y scheme .The O.P.no.1 also received the flood damage compensation to the tune of 100 % in his loan amount .The petitioner inquired about his crop damage compensation from the bank official of O.p.no. 1 who advised him to wait as agriculture insurance company is denying to settle his claim. Therefore the petitioner served a pleader notice with the grievance to settle his insurance claim but after receipt of the said notice the O.Ps did not take any steps regarding settlement of the insurance claim . Accordingly finding no other alternative the petitioner has knocked the door of this Fora to direct the O.Ps to pay Rs. 63,000/- the Insurance claim along with compensation, harassment and litigation expenses.
The O.P no.1 appeared through their learned advocate and subsequently filed the written version . But after the date of admission of the present dispute on 20. 09 .17 , thereafter the petitioner neither appeared nor taking any step on the date which was fixed by this Fora . Hence it is presumed , that the petitioner has no interest to proceed with the dispute . Subsequent to the matter was posted on 28.10.19 for hearing of the main dispute . In the mean time on 17.10.19 the advocate for O.P.No.1 filed an advance petition containing with an affidavit wherein it is stated that :
1.That the complainant borrower has filed the CD case being deprived up to get the crop Insurance amount.
2.That during pendency of this case the O.P Bank has repaid the entire claim amount in the complaint borrower’s respective loan A/C and the complainant borrower have duly acknowledged the amount. The O.P Bank submitted the relevant papers before the Hon’ble court and those papers are in the case record.
3.That after receipt of claim amount the complainant need not have turned up to withdraw the C.C.Case. In the aforesaid circumstances necessary order be passed to disposed up the case for the interest of justice .
Thereafter on the same day this fora vide its order dt. 17.10.19 ordered ;
“The record is put up on the strength of an advance petition filed by the O>ps. The O.ps also filed a petition along with an affidavit . Copy not served . Heard the petition. Accordingly the office is directed to send the copy of the petition, affidavit along with today’s order to the petitioner by R.P with A.D for filing objection and counter affidavit if any prior to 28.10.19 positively . Put up on the above date fixed for filing objection along with counter affidavit as well as hearing of the main case .
As the matter was fixed on 28.10.19 with an opportunity to file objection and counter affidavit against the affidavit filed from O.P.no.1. In the affidavit the O.P.no..1 has stated that he had already settled the claim of the petitioner .On that day the petitioner neither nor his representative nor his advocate appeared before this fora nor filed any objection / counter affidavit . Hence the matter again posted to 30.10.19 for hearing as last chance .
On the date of hearing the petitioner neither present nor filed the counter affidavit . Heard the learned counsel for the O.P .
After perusal of the affidavit there is no scope before this Fora to dis-believe the contention of the affidavit as there is no objection / counter affidavit filed from the side of the petitioner against the affidavit filed from the side of the O.P .
Accordingly the dispute is dismissed . No cost
This order is pronounced in the open Forum on this the 31st day of October,2019. under my hand and seal of the Forum.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.