Kerala

Alappuzha

CC/10/70

K.Johykuttty - Complainant(s)

Versus

Asst. Executive Engineer, Kerala Water Authority - Opp.Party(s)

30 Sep 2010

ORDER


Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumNear Pazhaveedu Village Office,Pazhaveedu P.O ,Alappuzha 688009
Complaint Case No. CC/10/70
1. K.JohykutttyKevin Villa, Vettiyar, Thazhakkara, MavelikaraAlappuzhaKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. Asst. Executive Engineer, Kerala Water AuthorityMavelikaraAlappuzhaKerala ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:
HONORABLE JIMMY KORAH ,PRESIDENTHONORABLE K.Anirudhan ,MemberHONORABLE Smt;Shajitha Beevi ,Member
PRESENT :

Dated : 25 Oct 2010
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

SRI. JIMMY KORAH (PRESIDENT)

Filed on 17.03.2010 

            The case of the complainant is that he is the consumer of the opposite parties and on 6.7.2009 he has got a letter from opposite parties stating that he obtained water connection on the basis of fraudulent ownership certificate and the opposite parties disconnected the water connection on 13.7.2009.  He alleged deficiency in service and hence the  present complaint.  

            2.  The case of the opposite parties is that complainant obtained the water connection on the basis of fraudulent document.   

               3.   On the side of the complainant filed proof affidavit and opposite parties

produced Exts.B1 to B5.

 

4.  We gone through the  pleadings, evidences and documents of the parties, it is clear that the connection is to newly built house of the complainant.  There is no irregularity on the side of the complainant in the matter of application for water connection.  There is deficiency in services on the part of the opposite parties.

            In the result, complaint is allowed and the opposite parties are directed to restore the water connection forthwith.   No order as to costs. 

            Dictated to the Confidential Asst. transcribed by her corrected to me  and pronounced in open Forum on this the 30th day of  September, 2010.

                                                                                                Sd/- Sri. Jimmy Korah:

                                                                                                Sd/- Sri. K. Anirudhan:

                                                                                          Sd/- Smt. N. Shajitha Beevi :         

Appendix:-

Evidence of the complainant:-

Complainant filed proof affidavit

 

Evidence of the opposite parties:-

 

Ext.B1              -                       Application dated 27.9.08 (Photo copy)

Ext.B2              -                       Letter dated 30.9.2009

Ext.B3              -                       Letter dated 6.10.09 (Photo copy)

Ext.B4              -                       Letter dated 13.7.09 (Photo copy)

Ext.B5              -                       Agreement No.88/09-10 (Photo copy)

 

// True Copy //                          By Order

 

                                                           

To                                                                                                                                                                                             Senior Superintendent

            Complainant/Opposite parties/S.F.

 

Typed by:-pr/-        Compared by:-                              


[HONORABLE K.Anirudhan] Member[HONORABLE JIMMY KORAH] PRESIDENT[HONORABLE Smt;Shajitha Beevi] Member