Rajasthan

StateCommission

FA/358/2014

Radhey Shyam s/o Bajrang Lal Mali - Complainant(s)

Versus

Assistent Engineer ( A-1) J.V.V.N.Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

24 Feb 2015

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1

 

FIRST APPEAL NO: 358/2014

 

Radhey Shyam s/o Sh.Bajranglal Mali, r/o Mahaveer Nagar, Mandi Road, Aalanpur, Sawaimadhopur.

Vs.

A.En. (A-1) JVVNL, Sawaimadhopur & ors.

 

Date of Order 24.02.2015

 

Before:

 

Hon'ble Mr.Vinay Kumar Chawla-Presiding Member

Mr. Kailash Soyal - Member

 

Mr.Pramod Kumar counsel for the appellant

Mr.Paras Jain counsel for the respondents

 

BY THE STATE COMMISSION

 

This appeal has been preferred against judgment dated 12.03.2014 passed by the learned DCF Sawaimadhopur. The learned DCF had allowed the complaint ordering the respondents

2

 

JVVNL to pay a sum of Rs.1100/- as cost of the complaint.

 

In this case the complainant had alleged that Rs.1124/- deposited by him towards consumption of electricity for the month of March 2012 and May 2012 were not accounted for in his account and similarly an amount of Rs.1133/- was consumption for the month of July 2012 was also not accounted for in his account. This fact was not controverted by the respondents before the learned DCF. They accepted the fact that due to error of the computer, the amount deposited by the complainant was not accounted for in his account. However, the learned DCF had accepted that a rectification has been made.

 

The learned counsel for the appellant has argued that though the respondents have admitted their mistake but still in the forthcoming bills balance amount is being shown as arrears and the learned DCF has not given any direction to cancel this amount shown as arrear.

 

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record. In the bill an arrear of Rs. 3717/- is being shown against the complainant when the respondents have admitted their mistake that this amount should be accepted.

3

 

We accept this appeal and modify the order of the learned DCF to the extent that an arrear of Rs. 3717/- raised against the complainant shall be dropped and he shall be issued bills for current usage of the electricity. Rest of the order is maintained.

 

 

(Kailash Soyal) (Vinay Kumar Chawla)

Member Presiding Member

 

 

nm

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.